Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Behavior of CiteAsAuthorsPlus and CiteAsAuthorsEtAl #6

Open
MasWag opened this issue Nov 18, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Behavior of CiteAsAuthorsPlus and CiteAsAuthorsEtAl #6

MasWag opened this issue Nov 18, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@MasWag
Copy link

MasWag commented Nov 18, 2023

It seems BiByFi with CiteAsAuthorsPlus or CiteAsAuthorsEtAl generates [(Last author)+ (Year)] (or something similar for CiteAsAuthorsEtAl) instead of [(First author)+ (Year)] at \cite. For example, for a paper with authors [Foo Bar; Baz Qux; Hoge Fuga], it generates something like [H. Fuga+ 2023] instead of [F. Bar+ 2023]. Is this as expected? It seems something like [F. Bar+ 2023] is more common (for instance, in https://www.scribbr.com/citing-sources/et-al/).

In my understanding, this is because of the List.reverse in

let authors = List.map shrink-name authors |> List.reverse in
.
(But I am not sure if we can safely remove this List.reverse...)

Here are a small example to reproduce this behavior: https://gist.github.com/MasWag/f71ecf4042f88fec9bcddcfebeab9151 and the resulting PDF file bibyfi-name-issue.pdf.
(But also reproducible by https://github.com/namachan10777/BiByFi/blob/master/example/cite-with-name.saty, and I am not sure if this is an unexpected behavior)

@namachan10777 namachan10777 self-assigned this Nov 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants