You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Unlike helm chart deployments of NATS-server, it's not possible to effectively specify cluster name to the NATS-server pods.
Although this name is passed to the operator, it's only left in the CRD metadata and not included in the nats.conf, which results in these messages on Pod startup:
[1] 2021/03/23 10:56:56.609732 [INF] Cluster name is GmB9rA3nEw2Viajfz9rNXf
[1] 2021/03/23 10:56:56.609734 [WRN] Cluster name was dynamically generated, consider setting one
Additionally, when rolling out the nodes in a cluster for reasons such as upgrade, sometimes some pods get stuck in a loop logging this state:
[1] 2021/03/23 10:55:31.844349 [ERR] 10.136.107.23:49442 - rid:490 - Rejecting connection, cluster name "" does not match "iZkmDO3Ocr5CudBfxKNmZq"
#311 passes the cluster name to the pod's cluster config to avoid this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Unlike helm chart deployments of NATS-server, it's not possible to effectively specify cluster name to the NATS-server pods.
Although this name is passed to the operator, it's only left in the CRD metadata and not included in the nats.conf, which results in these messages on Pod startup:
Additionally, when rolling out the nodes in a cluster for reasons such as upgrade, sometimes some pods get stuck in a loop logging this state:
#311 passes the cluster name to the pod's cluster config to avoid this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: