|
1 | | -# Pregnancy Health |
2 | | - |
3 | | -**Full Name**: Pex Bm Health Preg I Healthhx |
4 | | -**Acronym**: Healthhx |
5 | | -**Table Name**: `pex_bm_health_preg__healthhx` |
6 | | -**Construct**: Pre-pregnancy and pregnancy health |
7 | | - |
8 | | -<div id="alert" class="alert-banner" onclick="toggleCollapse(this)"> |
9 | | - <span class="emoji"><i class="fas fa-exclamation-circle"></i></span> |
10 | | - <span class="text-with-link"> |
11 | | - <span class="text">Responsible Use Warning: Pregnancy intention as a determinant of exposure</span> |
12 | | - <a class="anchor-link" href="#alert" title="Copy link"> |
13 | | - <i class="fa-solid fa-link"></i> |
14 | | - </a> |
15 | | - </span> |
16 | | - <span class="arrow">▸</span> |
17 | | -</div> |
18 | | -<div class="alert-collapsible-content"> |
19 | | -<p>Amidst powerful societal expectations to ‘do what’s best for the baby’ during pregnancy (i.e. by stopping substance use), up to half of pregnancies in the United States are unintended with 1 in 5 unwanted (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30315-6">Bearak et al. 2020</a>). This discrepancy contributes to implicit bias against pregnant individuals who use substances as ‘not caring about their babies’ which is neither humane, nor evidence based (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115071">Massey et al., 2022</a>). While cessation of substance use during pregnancy is universally recognized as optimal, the ability to make this “parental” sacrifice varies substantially between birthing individuals and within individuals between their different pregnancies (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-023-01396-z">Level et al., 2024</a>). Failure to recognize this inherent heterogeneity in pregnancy intention stigmatizes substance users who did not intend to want to become pregnant. Summarily, inclusion of pregnancy intention as a covariate in all studies that characterize prenatal substance exposure (in the absence of a strong justification otherwise) is thus strongly recommended to acknowledge myriad experiences of birthing parents who participated in HBCD who made this research possible.</p> |
20 | | -</div> |
21 | | - |
22 | | -## Administration & Quality Control |
23 | | - |
24 | | -<table class="table-no-vertical-lines" style="width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; table-layout: fixed;"> |
25 | | -<tbody> |
26 | | -<tr><td><b>Child Specific</b></td> |
27 | | -<td>No</td></tr> |
28 | | -<tr><td><b>Respondent</b></td> |
29 | | -<td>Pregnant Participant</td></tr> |
30 | | -<tr><td><b>Administration</b></td> |
31 | | -<td style="word-wrap: break-word; white-space: normal;">Self-administered</td></tr> |
32 | | -<tr><td><b>Visits</b></td> |
33 | | -<td>V01</td></tr> |
34 | | -<tr><td><b>Completion Time</b></td> |
35 | | -<td>5 min</td></tr> |
36 | | -<tr><td><b>Quality Control</b></td> |
37 | | -<td>Review response distributions for outliers.</td></tr> |
38 | | -</tbody> |
39 | | -</table> |
40 | | - |
41 | | -## Instrument Details |
42 | | - |
43 | | -**Pre-Pregnancy and Pregnancy Health Outcomes Assessed:** |
44 | | - |
45 | | -- Gravidity and parity |
46 | | -- Height and weight |
47 | | -- Pregnancy intentions |
48 | | -- Use of assisted reproductive technology |
49 | | -- Start of prenatal care |
50 | | -- Prenatal vitamin or aspirin use |
51 | | -- Secondhand smoke |
52 | | - |
53 | | -## References |
54 | | -<div class="references"> |
55 | | - <p>Bearak, J., Popinchalk, A., Ganatra, B., Moller, A.-B., Tunçalp, Ö., Beavin, C., Kwok, L., & Alkema, L. (2020). Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990-2019. The Lancet. Global Health, 8(9), e1152–e1161. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30315-6">https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30315-6</a></p> |
56 | | - <p>Level, R. A., Zhang, Y., Tiemeier, H., Estabrook, R., Shaw, D. S., Leve, L. D., Wakschlag, L. S., Reiss, D., Neiderhiser, J. M., & Massey, S. H. (2024). Unique influences of pregnancy and anticipated parenting on cigarette smoking: results and implications of a within-person, between-pregnancy study. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 27(2), 301–308. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-023-01396-z">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-023-01396-z</a></p> |
57 | | - <p>Massey, S. H., Neiderhiser, J. M., Shaw, D. S., Leve, L. D., Ganiban, J. M., & Reiss, D. (2012). Maternal self concept as a provider and cessation of substance use during pregnancy. Addictive Behaviors, 37(8), 956–961. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.04.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.04.002</a></p> |
58 | | - <p>Massey, S. H., Estabrook, R., Lapping-Carr, L., Newmark, R. L., Decety, J., Wisner, K. L., & Wakschlag, L. S. (2022). Are empathic processes mechanisms of pregnancy’s protective effect on smoking? Identification of a novel target for preventive intervention. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 305(115071), 115071. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115071">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115071</a></p> |
59 | | - <p>Schoenaker, D. A. J. M., Ploubidis, G. B., Goodman, A., & Mishra, G. D. (2017). Factors across the life course predict women’s change in smoking behaviour during pregnancy and in midlife: results from the National Child Development Study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 71(12), 1137–1144. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2017-209493">https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2017-209493</a></p> |
60 | | -</div> |
| 1 | +<html> |
| 2 | + <head> |
| 3 | + <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url=https://docs.hbcdstudy.org/latest/instruments/pregexp/pex/" /> |
| 4 | + </head> |
| 5 | +</html> |
0 commit comments