Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MIRDEEP2_MIRDEEP2 task no same #496

Closed
ladygagaclass opened this issue Jan 4, 2025 · 10 comments
Closed

MIRDEEP2_MIRDEEP2 task no same #496

ladygagaclass opened this issue Jan 4, 2025 · 10 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@ladygagaclass
Copy link

Description of the bug

when chioce bowtie_index is folder ,folder hava *.ebwt
Image

MIRDEEP2_MIRDEEP2 task size = 1

but choice bowtie_index is tar
MIRDEEP2_MIRDEEP2 task size == sample size

Command used and terminal output

Relevant files

No response

System information

No response

@ladygagaclass ladygagaclass added the bug Something isn't working label Jan 4, 2025
@kopichris
Copy link

Hi @ladygagaclass, I am not the repository maintainer, but happy to help troubleshoot. If you could provide additional details, such as the command used and terminal output, this would be really helpful in identifying the source of the issue.

@ladygagaclass
Copy link
Author

Hi @ladygagaclass, I am not the repository maintainer, but happy to help troubleshoot. If you could provide additional details, such as the command used and terminal output, this would be really helpful in identifying the source of the issue.

Image my input have 3 sample ,when bowtie_index chioce is a bowtie_index.tar file or no chioce bowtie_index ,the process have 3 task. but bowtie_index chioce a directory ,The data in the folder is same with the bowtie_index.tar data,the process hava 1 task

@kopichris
Copy link

Hi @ladygagaclass, would it be possible to share the specific command you used and the corresponding terminal output; or a copy of the nextflow.log file? Providing this information is really helpful in troubleshooting these types of issues.

@nschcolnicov
Copy link
Contributor

@ladygagaclass @kopichris I'll take a look at this error too, could be that the bowtie_index channel is being consumed by what you describe. I'll run some tests and get back to you

@nschcolnicov
Copy link
Contributor

I was able to reproduce the error, will submit a fix soon

@nschcolnicov
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ladygagaclass please try running the same command you tried before but using the patched branch, and let me know if the problem was fixed. It worked in my tests.

You can do this by adding "-r issue_496 -latest" to the command you used, -r to provide the branch, and -latest to make sure that the latest version gets pulled before running.

Note: If you were running the pipeline locally, i.e: "nextflow run main.nf ...", you will need to modify the command to run the pipeline remotely.

An example of a remote execution would be:
nextflow run nf-core/smrnaseq -r issue_496 -latest ...(the rest of the command should be the same)

@ladygagaclass
Copy link
Author

Hi @ladygagaclass please try running the same command you tried before but using the patched branch, and let me know if the problem was fixed. It worked in my tests.

You can do this by adding "-r issue_496 -latest" to the command you used, -r to provide the branch, and -latest to make sure that the latest version gets pulled before running.

Note: If you were running the pipeline locally, i.e: "nextflow run main.nf ...", you will need to modify the command to run the pipeline remotely.

An example of a remote execution would be: nextflow run nf-core/smrnaseq -r issue_496 -latest ...(the rest of the command should be the same)

OK, Thank you ,I try running solved this problem。Can you help me solve the same problem this project version 2.3.1
NFCORE_SMRNASEQ:MIRDEEP2:MIRDEEP2_RUN process ?

@nschcolnicov
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ladygagaclass, I'm happy to hear that! Unfortunately, I can't fix an older version that has already been released, I can only fix it and release a new version.
If you really need to use the version 2.3.1 you can try applying these changes to your local copy of the pipeline. Here is the PR so you can see how I fixed this issue: https://github.com/nf-core/smrnaseq/pull/498/files#diff-4268eecd776ab2fd87defb0194d42ef7b1c0b6213e23b08f23056c6d85e3ccb0

@ladygagaclass
Copy link
Author

Hi @ladygagaclass, I'm happy to hear that! Unfortunately, I can't fix an older version that has already been released, I can only fix it and release a new version. If you really need to use the version 2.3.1 you can try applying these changes to your local copy of the pipeline. Here is the PR so you can see how I fixed this issue: https://github.com/nf-core/smrnaseq/pull/498/files#diff-4268eecd776ab2fd87defb0194d42ef7b1c0b6213e23b08f23056c6d85e3ccb0

OK,Thank you

@nschcolnicov
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this ticket, the fixes are now available in the dev branch

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants