was namespace considered (i.e falso
)?
#357
Unanswered
gerardolima
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hey, folks, I recently learned about
falso
and it looks good -- thank you already for your work! When I started writing tests, though, I missed using a namespace and felt like the choice of exporting top-level functions led to the usage of therand
prefix, instead (thought this is not completely consistent). As I think this would provide better developer experience, I wonder whether this option was considered.For example, please, refer to the alternative code below:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions