You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 4, 2021. It is now read-only.
We should support the finding of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in two ways:
Design of a nonparametric method for assessing whether a region may be labeled as a DMR --- this should build upon work in the detection of sparse signals, using the test statistic for the TMLE of the target parameter of choice as a score, over which such techniques may operate (e.g., see the work of T. Cai, X. Lin). This idea stemmed from helpful conversations with Rajarshi Mukherjee.
Integration with already existing techniques/software for the detection of DMRs. Algorithms and software like bumphunter generate p-values from test statistics derived from parametric models; however, the DMR detection methods themselves are nonparametric usually (e.g., permutation tests). It should be possible --- even relatively trivial --- to use the p-values derived from the TMLE procedures provided as input to the DMR-finding algorithms of other Bioconductor packages. This would amount to a very useful integration with existing software. This idea stemmed from helpful conversations with Alan Hubbard.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We should support the finding of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in two ways:
Design of a nonparametric method for assessing whether a region may be labeled as a DMR --- this should build upon work in the detection of sparse signals, using the test statistic for the TMLE of the target parameter of choice as a score, over which such techniques may operate (e.g., see the work of T. Cai, X. Lin). This idea stemmed from helpful conversations with Rajarshi Mukherjee.
Integration with already existing techniques/software for the detection of DMRs. Algorithms and software like
bumphunter
generate p-values from test statistics derived from parametric models; however, the DMR detection methods themselves are nonparametric usually (e.g., permutation tests). It should be possible --- even relatively trivial --- to use the p-values derived from the TMLE procedures provided as input to the DMR-finding algorithms of other Bioconductor packages. This would amount to a very useful integration with existing software. This idea stemmed from helpful conversations with Alan Hubbard.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: