-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
Analyzers FluentAssertions -> NUnit #834
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I can see that analyzers would be helpful for migrating - like https://github.com/wachulski/nunit-migrator is for migrating from NUnit 2 to NUnit 3. That being said I'm unsure if it should be part of the this repository or a separate set of analyzers. I guess the analyzers will contain a lot of knowledge about FluentAssertions - the syntax and semantics - and that is not particular related to NUnit. |
@mikkelbu Would the NUnit team be willing to set up a GitHub repository and the publish pipeline for a new NuGet package (e.g. (I see in https://www.nuget.org/packages/fluentassertions/#usedby-body-tab that https://github.com/DevToys-app/DevToys uses FluentAssertions 6, which can be used for testing purposes.) |
I cannot answer on behalf of the rest of the team (I can delegate the question to them), but personally I think it would be better to first create a project with some content before setting up a NUnit repository. Personally, I don't think I'll have time to work on such a project (I already have a hard time keeping up with the existing NUnit repos at the moment). Relating to publish pipelines then I think each major NUnit repo (the framework, the adapter, the console, this project ...) has it own kind of pipeline(s), so it is not like we have some common setup. |
As you may have heard, FluentAssertions changed to a paid license. What do you think about analyzers to easily migrate from FluentAssertions to NUnit?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: