Should the LSP be a subcommand on the main typst CLI

[cmoog]

I'm wondering if there is a strong case for moving this into the typst CLI itself. Prior art for this pattern can be found in the deno CLI, which embeds its own LSP. This prevents the possibility of version drift between the embedded LSP compiler and a separately installed, standalone compiler.

[beeb]

At the moment, version drift is prevent by doing the opposite, whereby the compiler is embedded into the LSP binary. But I would see this as an improvement in the case where the user would use the typst binary to compile and only use the LSP to check for diagnostic errors.