-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NTR: 4x P01 codes for SPI Sediment Analysis [BODCNVS-2309] #266
Comments
Would require the following new elements:
|
Thanks @danibodc. A few comments and questions in relation to this ticket "Penetration depth" is a useful concept to have in S06. However as a stand alone term, it needs to be defined carefully because it can be applied to multiple domains and take slightly different meaning when associated with an object of interest and matrix in the P01 combination. QUDT does not have a broad "Penetration depth" in its collection of quantity kinds but it has a more specific term "https://qudt.org/vocab/quantitykind/LondonPenetrationDepth" Regarding the associated P01, I would prefer e.g.: "Penetration depth of the instrument prism in the sediment by etc" - but do we even need to specify "prism"? also do we need to specify by sediment profiling imager and computation using ImageJ software algorithm? A more generic alternative could be: "Penetration depth of the instrument in the sediment"? I note though that you quoted that "prism penetration depth: gives an indication of relative sediment compaction" |
For: I think this works well. It could be that we need to use the S06 for Depth (spatial coordinate) here? Because it is the depth at which something is rather than the depth of something? Not sure... |
For: Surface roughness of the sediment-water interface by sediment profiling imager and computation using ImageJ software algorithm Yes, I think that works well. Surface roughness would be a useful re-usable concept to have in S06 although it might be tricky to define? I see that its expressed as a length but could not find a definition that relates it to a length in my (very quick) search. for the S29 yes I do like sediment-water interface. Again this is a useful re-usable concept to have. I agree that it could also be seafloor or sediment (bed seems strange in tis context without a "the" in front of it. But sediment-water interface would get my vote. |
Thanks everyone for taking a look at these codes! They look great. I've got a couple notes for context:
I hope this helps - do let me know if you need any more info on the above! |
4 new terms requested for parameters produced from Sediment Profiling Imagery (SPI) analysis.
Details of the Sediment Profiling Imager:
https://www.oceanimagingsystems.com/docs/REMOTS-3731D-24MP.pdf
https://www.oceanimagingsystems.com/products.php#SPI
At each SPI station the camera was ‘hopped’ along the sea bed at 10m intervals, providing 5 images for analysis. Images were analysed using the software ImageJ for penetration depth, apparent redox penetration depth (aRPD) and surface roughness, following the method as described in Teal et. al (2010).
Originator's Parameter names:
These are described on p.180:
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jonathan-White-32/publication/269630850_Review_of_standards_and_protocols_for_seabed_habitat_mapping/links/55e06b7608ae2fac471b6de3/Review-of-standards-and-protocols-for-seabed-habitat-mapping.pdf
Proposed P01 preferred labels:
R.e. 'Surface roughness of the sediment-water interface by sediment profiling imager and computation using ImageJ software algorithm'
Am not sure if not specifying a matrix is ok here. The sediment-water interface is technically the floor/bed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: