Deprecate duplicated codes for Mole fraction at 100% humidity of carbon dioxide {CO2 CAS 124-38-9} {xCO2} in the atmosphere

[gwemon]

The following 2 terms look identical in their current version: http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/P01/current/XCO2EQWT/ and http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/P01/current/XCO2WTAT/. THe former is linked to P02='TMES, the latter ACO2.

Check that the issue was not created when the terms were migrated to the new semnatic model, compare previous versions and deprecate the redundant code if necessary.

[roy-lowry]

Hi Gwen, Look like an accidental duplicate to me. Cherrs, Roy. I have now retired but will continue to be active through an Emeritus Fellowship using this e-mail address.

…

________________________________ From: Gwen Moncoiffé ***@***.***> Sent: 04 December 2021 17:42 To: nvs-vocabs/P01 ***@***.***> Cc: Subscribed ***@***.***> Subject: [nvs-vocabs/P01] Deprecate duplicated codes for Mole fraction at 100% humidity of carbon dioxide {CO2 CAS 124-38-9} {xCO2} in the atmosphere (Issue #99) Caution: This email has originated from outside of the organisation. Do not click links or open attachments unless you have verified the sender and content is safe. Thank you. The following 2 terms look identical int heir current version: http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/P01/current/XCO2EQWT/ and http://vocab.nerc.ac.uk/collection/P01/current/XCO2WTAT/ Check that the issue was not created when the terms were migrated to the new semnatic model, compare previous versions and deprecate the redundant code if necessary. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#99>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIUW4YTXWOKOUMD6JNNDKLTUPJHJHANCNFSM5JLZJRCA>. Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS<https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android<https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>. This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the named recipients. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this email or any of its attachments and should notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system. The National Oceanography Centre (NOC) has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise risk of this email or any attachments containing viruses or malware but the recipient should carry out its own virus and malware checks before opening the attachments. NOC does not accept any liability for any losses or damages which the recipient may sustain due to presence of any viruses. Opinions, conclusions or other information in this message and attachments that are not related directly to NOC business are solely those of the author and do not represent the views of NOC.

[roy-lowry]

Looked again, this time reading the definitions. Seem to remember SDN:P01::XCO2EQWT was set up as part of a set of codes for work @gwemon was doing for handling data from underway pCO2 systems of ships of opportunity. Might be worth looking at the whole set of codes to see if there is any significant difference between thee two. Does it matter whether or not the sample is within the analytical equipment? My instinctive answer is no.