Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dataized.java:64-67: It is necessary to call {@link... #3299

Open
0pdd opened this issue Jul 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Dataized.java:64-67: It is necessary to call {@link... #3299

0pdd opened this issue Jul 29, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link

0pdd commented Jul 29, 2024

The puzzle 2251-f49f0da1 from #2251 has to be resolved:

* @todo #2251:90min It is necessary to call {@link ThreadLocal#remove()} on
* {@link Dataized#MAX_LEVEL} variables to prevent memory leaks. We should either find a place
* where this variable can be removed, or, if this is not possible
* (see https://github.com/objectionary/eo/pull/1930), come up with another solution.

The puzzle was created by Yegor Bugayenko on 29-Jul-24.

Estimate: 90 minutes, role: DEV.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

Copy link

@0pdd thanks for the report, here is a feedback:

  • The todo message is clear about what needs to be done, but it doesn't specify who needs to do it. To improve the message, it should specify whether it's a task for the developer, a code reviewer, or someone else.
  • The todo message refers to a Github pull request for context, but it doesn't describe what the pull request is about. It would be more helpful if the todo message included a brief summary of the pull request.
  • The todo message says that it's necessary to call a specific method on certain variables to prevent memory leaks, but it doesn't explain why this is necessary or what the consequences might be if it's not done. The message could be improved by providing more context about why this task is important.

Please fix the bug report in order it to get resolved faster.
Analyzed with gpt-4

@0pdd
Copy link
Author

0pdd commented Jul 29, 2024

@0pdd thanks for the report, here is a feedback: * The todo message is clear about what needs to be ...

I see you're talking to me, but I can't reply since I'm not a chat bot.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant