[FIX] hr_holidays: fix search on leave type

**Steps to reproduce:**
Navigate to Time Off >> Configuration >> Time Off Types >> Open any type, navigate to the Smart button Time Off >> Click on New >> Time Off Type
Leads to an error.

Reference Video: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vi_apL24Km5tSomQtwcTArqqWvrBR5ni/view?usp=drive_link

**Reason:**
The `op` function is a comparison operator function that expects two values to compare and we are only passing to it `leave_type.virtual_remaining_leaves` parameter.

**Solution:**
Added the missing `value` parameter.

Task: 5238200

Author: HashemKhaled

addons/hr_holidays/models/hr_leave_type.py

@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ def _search_virtual_remaining_leaves(self, operator, value):
         leave_types = self.env['hr.leave.type'].search([])
 
         def is_valid(leave_type):
-            return not leave_type.requires_allocation or op(leave_type.virtual_remaining_leaves)
+            return not leave_type.requires_allocation or op(leave_type.virtual_remaining_leaves, value)
         return [('id', 'in', leave_types.filtered(is_valid).ids)]
 
     @api.depends_context('employee_id', 'default_employee_id', 'leave_date_from', 'default_date_from')

addons/hr_holidays/tests/test_hr_leave_type.py

@@ -114,3 +114,59 @@ def test_users_tz_shift_back(self):
             ).search([('has_valid_allocation', '=', True)], limit=1)
 
         self.assertFalse(leave_types, "Got valid leaves outside vaild period")
+
+    def test_search_virtual_remaining_leaves(self):
+        employee = self.env['hr.employee'].create({'name': 'Test Employee'})
+        leave_type_1 = self.env['hr.leave.type'].create({
+            'name': 'Test Leave 1',
+            'requires_allocation': True,
+        })
+        leave_type_2 = self.env['hr.leave.type'].create({
+            'name': 'Test Leave 2',
+            'requires_allocation': False,
+        })
+
+        self.env['hr.leave.allocation'].sudo().create({
+            'state': 'confirm',
+            'holiday_status_id': leave_type_1.id,
+            'employee_id': employee.id,
+            'number_of_days': 4,
+            'date_from': '2025-01-01',
+            'date_to': '2025-12-31',
+        }).action_approve()
+
+        result = (
+            self.env["hr.leave.type"]
+            .with_context(employee_id=employee.id)
+            .search([("virtual_remaining_leaves", ">", 0)])
+        )
+        self.assertIn(
+            leave_type_1, result, "Leave Type 1 should be in the result as it has remaining leaves",
+        )
+        self.assertIn(
+            leave_type_2, result, "Leave Type 2 should be in the result since it does not require allocation",
+        )
+
+        result = (
+            self.env["hr.leave.type"]
+            .with_context(employee_id=employee.id)
+            .search([("virtual_remaining_leaves", "=", 0)])
+        )
+        self.assertNotIn(
+            leave_type_1, result, "Leave Type 1 should not be in the result as it has remaining leaves != 0",
+        )
+        self.assertIn(
+            leave_type_2, result, "Leave Type 2 should be in the result since it does not require allocation",
+        )
+
+        result = (
+            self.env["hr.leave.type"]
+            .with_context(employee_id=employee.id)
+            .search([("virtual_remaining_leaves", ">", 4)])
+        )
+        self.assertNotIn(
+            leave_type_1, result, "Leave Type 1 should not be in the result",
+        )
+        self.assertIn(
+            leave_type_2, result, "Leave Type 2 should be in the result since it does not require allocation",
+        )