Reasoning models using <think>...</think> #669
fredrikaverpil
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
Thanks for sharing. Very excited to see this released. I won't be able to look into this for some weeks so would appreciate your views on how it works, functions and if there are any changes required under the hood of the plugin to get the most from it. Regarding syntax, you could apply this yourself in your own config, similarly to how I've done in the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I just tried deepseek-r1 out with ollama and it seems these new reasoning models are wrapping their reasoning inside
<think></think>
tags before answering the actual question.Just figured I'd give a headsup on this, and that perhaps you could do some nice formatting of this text in the chat window, like italics perhaps 😄. And perhaps there are some other potential nice features that you can build based on this 🤔
Btw, maybe you want to add a deepseek adapter?
https://api-docs.deepseek.com/
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions