Can changelogs be bad? / Ignoring Deprecations

[PhilLAL]

Hi,
thank you for this good practices you'va gathered.

While reading https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/#bad-practices, in

When people upgrade from one version to another, it should be painfully clear when something will break. It should be possible to upgrade to a version that lists deprecations, remove what's deprecated, then upgrade to the version where the deprecations become removals.

If you do nothing else, list deprecations, removals, and any breaking changes in your changelog.

I do not understand what means It should be possible to upgrade to a version that lists deprecations, remove what's deprecated, then upgrade to the version where the deprecations become removals.

Does it mean the following?

It should be possible to consecutively upgrade to a version giving a list of deprecations, then remove what's deprecated, and then upgrade to the version where the deprecations become removals.

Regards