Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

(user-scopes) remove usage of v1.8 scopes #7967

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024
Merged

(user-scopes) remove usage of v1.8 scopes #7967

merged 7 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

Zangetsu101
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Oops! Looks like you forgot to update the changelog. When updating CHANGELOG.md, please consider the following:

  • Changelog is read by country implementors who might not always be familiar with all technical details of OpenCRVS. Keep language high-level, user friendly and avoid technical references to internals.
  • Answer "What's new?", "Why was the change made?" and "Why should I care?" for each change.
  • If it's a breaking change, include a migration guide answering "What do I need to do to upgrade?".

@Nil20
Copy link
Collaborator

Nil20 commented Nov 13, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Farajaland PR regarding removing 1.8 scopes: opencrvs/opencrvs-farajaland#1160

@Zangetsu101 Zangetsu101 merged commit 95e203b into configurable-roles Nov 13, 2024
56 of 61 checks passed
@Zangetsu101 Zangetsu101 deleted the remove-usage-of-future-scopes branch November 13, 2024 13:57
@Zangetsu101 Zangetsu101 restored the remove-usage-of-future-scopes branch November 13, 2024 14:15
@Zangetsu101 Zangetsu101 deleted the remove-usage-of-future-scopes branch November 13, 2024 14:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Nil20 Nil20 Nil20 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
💅 Waiting For Review
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Zangetsu101 @Nil20