Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deal with different temporal resolutions/horizons in the different market and grid optimizations #709

Open
ulfmueller opened this issue Jan 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ulfmueller
Copy link
Member

The UC rolling horizon problem probably needs every hour of the year which right now implies a skip_snapshots=False. But in the pre market simulation we might want to skip snapshots. And what do we do in the grid optimization. Rolling horizon is not really an option due to the investment optimizations we need then again a skip snapshots probably (ideally including the UC constraints for the redispatch generators).

@ClaraBuettner
Copy link
Contributor

Would it already help to apply the temporal clustering/skipping only on the grid optimization part and keep all the market optimizations in the full temporal complexity? I could implement this very easily. It will not solve the problem but could be an easy intermediate solution.

@ClaraBuettner
Copy link
Contributor

Due to commit 4e634ec the temporal aggregation methods are only applied on the grid_model, the market_model always keeps the full temporal complexity.
This will not be the final solution as we would like (and probably also need) temporal aggregation within (some of) the market optimization steps. But at least we can run some larger calculations to try out our new method, since we definitely need temporal complexity reduction for the gri_optimization in a suitable spatial resolution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants