-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OpenRCA graph structure #4
Comments
During our work we experienced difficulties in using Force-Directed graph type in OpenRCA. Number of nodes and links presented in a graph can be really huge depends on operator infrastructure. Force-Directed tree is very effective form of chart, but may not work in our case. High complexity of Force-Directed algorithm results in comfortable graph usage in case with a very limited number of nodes on average hardware equipment. One of possibility to get rid off this problem is to take care of limit of visible nodes and links. It can be done in different ways, like display only nodes in one namespace (not whole infrastructure). I think that we should consider different approach, using more static graph format. One of the interesting examples I found here. In easy way user can display only the part of the analyzed project that interests him. It could have a big impact in improving performance and potentially reach more users. |
@k-jano Totally agree!
That's the approach that we will undertake. For instance, present only the service, pod, and node objects initially, and expand other objects (config maps, secrets, replica sets) on demand.
Yes, we could present a single namespace by default and enable the user to add other namespaces according to needs (multi-namespace selector).
I like the collapsable graph branches. Please, check out the examples below for more inspiration: Let's discuss our ideas during the next weekly meeting 😉 |
I want to share with some research results. The aim was to optimize the current simulation and consider other approaches.
In my opinion we should consider point 3, so far we obtained great simulation with nice feature. If decreasing graph element heaviness is possible, we should try to do it. |
The process of making the final graph structure will take some time. It would be great to held discussion in one issue.
During this process we should pay attention to many available visualization and get the best out of them. Examples shared in this issue will definitly be a good inspiration to OpenRCA final graph.
I want to share with example of Force-Directed Tree from
D3.js
library. This hierarchial graph captures well network structure and visualize it in very intuitive way. We can easily extract sets of vertices forming a group in a graph.It would be great to share your ideas and examples of network visualizations!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: