Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[JPMS Support] Initial phase-0 Refactor of org.apache.lucene codebase to eliminate top level split packages #17241

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2025

Conversation

prudhvigodithi
Copy link
Member

Description

Related Issues

Part of #8110

Check List

  • Functionality includes testing.
  • API changes companion pull request created, if applicable.
  • Public documentation issue/PR created, if applicable.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

❌ Gradle check result for 5c0e270: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@prudhvigodithi prudhvigodithi force-pushed the 3.0.0-refactor branch 2 times, most recently from 55bfb3d to 4788400 Compare February 4, 2025 01:59
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

❌ Gradle check result for 4788400: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

❌ Gradle check result for 4788400: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

@reta
Copy link
Collaborator

reta commented Feb 4, 2025

Thanks @prudhvigodithi , the general direction definitely makes sense to me, but some changes may lead to regressions or functional changes, that we should try to avoid at all costs (I think), thank you.

@prudhvigodithi
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @reta, I see you pointed one #17241 (comment), I will double check but is there anything else we should avoid ?
Adding @msfroh @andrross @getsaurabh02

@reta
Copy link
Collaborator

reta commented Feb 4, 2025

Thanks @reta, I see you pointed one #17241 (comment), I will double check but is there anything else we should avoid ?

I would be surprised to see no test failures ...

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

✅ Gradle check result for b3347c3: SUCCESS

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 86.66667% with 14 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 72.45%. Comparing base (faabd10) to head (17a2020).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../java/org/opensearch/common/util/CuckooFilter.java 82.43% 1 Missing and 12 partials ⚠️
.../lucene/util/automaton/MinimizationOperations.java 95.83% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #17241      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     72.36%   72.45%   +0.09%     
+ Complexity    65733    65662      -71     
============================================
  Files          5318     5314       -4     
  Lines        305674   305141     -533     
  Branches      44349    44265      -84     
============================================
- Hits         221197   221092     -105     
+ Misses        66341    65945     -396     
+ Partials      18136    18104      -32     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 4, 2025

❕ Gradle check result for 4fc0267: UNSTABLE

Please review all flaky tests that succeeded after retry and create an issue if one does not already exist to track the flaky failure.

Signed-off-by: Prudhvi Godithi <pgodithi@amazon.com>
@prudhvigodithi prudhvigodithi changed the title [JPMS Support] Refactor the org.apache.lucene codebase to eliminate top level split packages [JPMS Support] Initial phase-0 Refactor of org.apache.lucene codebase to eliminate top level split packages Feb 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

❌ Gradle check result for 17a2020: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

❌ Gradle check result for 17a2020: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

❌ Gradle check result for 17a2020: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

✅ Gradle check result for 17a2020: SUCCESS

@prudhvigodithi
Copy link
Member Author

prudhvigodithi commented Feb 5, 2025

Got green for gradle check @msfroh @reta please see if we can get this merged.
Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants