You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm training a custom dataset of 1000px square on Efficient_AD. I'm using the albumentations yaml output as an argument in transform_config for eval and val. Does this transform_config actually transform the anomaly mask?
Unless I specify resize 256px (the size of my config.yaml for Effecient_AD) in albumentations, I get a dimension mismatch on training. When I do specify the resize 256px in albumentations, I get a image AUROC of about 50% versus 70-80% without albumentations.
So in addition to wondering whether transform_config transforms the masks, I'm also wondering if resizing at the albumentation level rather than at the model layer is causing an issue.
EDIT: Sorry, my initial description and questions were not well phrased.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I'm training a custom dataset of 1000px square on Efficient_AD. I'm using the albumentations yaml output as an argument in transform_config for eval and val. Does this transform_config actually transform the anomaly mask?
Unless I specify resize 256px (the size of my config.yaml for Effecient_AD) in albumentations, I get a dimension mismatch on training. When I do specify the resize 256px in albumentations, I get a image AUROC of about 50% versus 70-80% without albumentations.
So in addition to wondering whether transform_config transforms the masks, I'm also wondering if resizing at the albumentation level rather than at the model layer is causing an issue.
EDIT: Sorry, my initial description and questions were not well phrased.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions