You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Many (most ?) Kolibri channels are populated by ricecooker which creates everything needed locally and then uploads this to a Kolibri Studio Channel
The scraper then retrieves this Studio Channel and creates a ZIM.
While convenient when the Studio Channel is well maintained, it proves to be a burden when we struggle to get Studio Channel updated (like we face with openzim/zim-requests#729).
We might want to consider to:
run ricecooker in "dry-run" mode, where files are created locally but not uploaded to a Studio Channel
directly process these files with the scraper to create a ZIM
This change might be quite straightforward since what we download from the Studio Channel is maybe very close to what we would get locally from rice-cooker. And we would continue to benefit from the rest of the scraper enhancements (ZIM UI, ...).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Many (most ?) Kolibri channels are populated by ricecooker which creates everything needed locally and then uploads this to a Kolibri Studio Channel
The scraper then retrieves this Studio Channel and creates a ZIM.
While convenient when the Studio Channel is well maintained, it proves to be a burden when we struggle to get Studio Channel updated (like we face with openzim/zim-requests#729).
We might want to consider to:
ricecooker
in "dry-run" mode, where files are created locally but not uploaded to a Studio ChannelThis change might be quite straightforward since what we download from the Studio Channel is maybe very close to what we would get locally from rice-cooker. And we would continue to benefit from the rest of the scraper enhancements (ZIM UI, ...).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: