extra step to compile, run, build and test changes #440
-
Congratulations from the newly released version 12, @orbitalquark (and each contributor). I read at https://orbitalquark.github.io/textadept/manual.html#compile-run-build-and-test-changes:
Sorry, but is there any way to get the previous behavior (not to require extra user input)? I would be surprised, if I would be the only one that this new feature (which doesn’t seem to be mentioned in https://orbitalquark.github.io/textadept/changelog.html) causes only issues (besides the extra input, forgetting to press the key and thinking that something is wrong with compilation). I hope it can be at least deactivated. Many thanks for your help. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 4 comments 7 replies
-
It took me a while to get used to it too. I think the only way to go back to the old behavior is to edit modules/textadept/run.lua from this: textadept/modules/textadept/run.lua Lines 149 to 150 in f08b6c3 to
Sorry for the trouble :( |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Could we not enable the old behavior via a flag? i.e Otherwise, those who want that behavior will have update that file after every update |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The rationale behind the confirmation is that I often want to change arguments to run/compile/build/test commands, and I'd like to keep a history of those changes (like in a command line). Think An option to bypass this sounds reasonable. As for why this option is not present is because when I announced this change back in October 2022, nobody spoke up. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I've added a new It will be in the next nightly build. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
The rationale behind the confirmation is that I often want to change arguments to run/compile/build/test commands, and I'd like to keep a history of those changes (like in a command line). Think
Makefile
rules, names of tests to run, arguments to shell scripts, etc.An option to bypass this sounds reasonable.
As for why this option is not present is because when I announced this change back in October 2022, nobody spoke up.