Replies: 5 comments
-
Just adding that once the RANGES stuff is added and if the hundreds of measurements in #4533 plus this antler stuff are added - the list of mammal attributes will be pretty BIG. Asking people to scroll through it might be frustrating or intimidating OR maybe it is fine? Just start typing the attribute you want and get there? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Just typing the start of a value and having the dropdown go there would be a big help. . . possible? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Possibility: store stuff as JSON - would allow any level of complexity, take only one columns. Would need UI/schema/??? development. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
See also https://github.com/ArctosDB/code-table-work/issues/79 - I am still having difficulty determining a direction. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Between some recent projects, data like #6175, similar data for marine mammals, etc., it seems that we're destined to have hundreds (thousands?!) of attributes.
#3452 may (eventually) make it easier for eg a rodent-centric mammal collection to avoid being overwhelmed with cetacean-specific attributes.
#6111 is the start of a conversation regarding dealing with attributes in tabular form.
@Jegelewicz and I can find no realistic alternatives to just creating attributes as they're requested. This Issue is an acknowledgement that we see the slippery slope and are not sure what's at the bottom of the cliff.
Any alternative viewpoints or approaches, concerns, thoughts, illumination, etc., greatly appreciated!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions