Site usability #2
IcannotThinkOfAnymoreNames
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hi @IcannotThinkOfAnymoreNames, I'm sorry but I don't quite follow. Could you please elaborate on what the numbers mean? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I've been mapping the usability of your site, if slowly, and hope this might help. I'm working backwards from 165...
.60
87 (Will not load) (Windows 8.1 desktop Latest Chrome/Brave/and Older Firefox tried for this and all below)
98-100 (Will not load)
106-11 (Will not load)
114-8 (Will not load)
125 (Will not load)
137,8 (Will not load!!)
153 Seqs and Pop (Will not load!!)
155 top (fav!!!)
164 (fav!!!)
165 all?? finally!! (Will not load!!!)
70 and 120, huge lists appear to be return limited. Could you provide a numerical number of returns in total to allow for weekly estimates of total new variants in each family? Which is my present use for large lists.
Great site otherwise. This will soon be replacing the CDC on my nightly update. They are apparently too busy following the science to report information promptly anymore. They now report bi-weekly? oh, the bad bi-weekly.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions