Automatic Calibration of Anchor Location for LPS [Proposal] #62
magicbycalvin
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
I did some experiments some years ago on this topic. I think it can be done but I did not manage to reach a point where I thought the functionality justified the extra complexity in the code base. I only spent a day or so on the problem though :-) A starting point could be the work by Mike Hamer (http://mikehamer.info/uwb-system/) back in 2016. Mike also wrote the initial version of the kalman filter that is used in the Crazyflie. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
As suggested here, I would like to propose the implementation of automatic location calibration of the LPS anchors. For the present system, it is necessary to manually measure and record the 3D location of each anchor. This can introduce measurement uncertainties (which may not be too big of an issue since it has been mentioned that a deviation of up to +/- 5 cm shouldn't cause much of a problem) and is quite an inconvenience. Furthermore, it is infeasible to quickly move the LPS to a different location without a team of people familiar with the system. Fortunately, there is plenty of work that has been done with regards to state estimation and while implementing automatic calibration will by no means be trivial, it should be possible.
@knmcguire has mentioned that they will share some relevant publications regarding this idea. As this system is tangentially related to my research, I will be happy to spend some free time looking into the solution as well. Any helpful contributions from others will be very much appreciated!
Thank you for your time!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions