Replies: 5 comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
-
If you want this feature, please do not teach us how to How to prove this is useful? Please refer to #4 (comment) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Workaround: Deploy multiple SRS cloud by docker. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Since SRS Stack now supports Docker and script deployment, multiple instances of SRS Stack can be deployed, supporting the forwarding of more platforms or more streams. Why not expand the capacity of a single SRS Stack? This is because a single machine is not unlimited in the first place. Supporting three streams can already max out the bandwidth of many servers, so supporting more would be pointless. If there really are a few scenarios with a lot of server bandwidth, then multiple instances can be used, and they can be handled in a way that isolates them by port. In fact, many times, users who raise this requirement are not aware that their servers are limited. They always feel that one server can support thousands of concurrent connections, but in reality, this is not the case.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Douyin, Video Number, Bilibili, Kuaishou, Xigua, Huya, Douyu 127, Local.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions