Roadmap for integration with OCaml 5.0?

[ghennequin]

@ryanrhymes @jzstark Just wondering, do you guys have a roadmap towards making sure owl plays well with OCaml 5.0?

[jzstark]

Thanks for asking. We are beginning to migrate to OCaml 5.0 while removing certain parts of Owl. Currently the code compiles and runs fine on 5.0, but we will see if any more change is required.

[ghennequin]

Thanks! I was wondering if there are global mutable states (e.g. random number generators, AD tape, ...) for which we should provide the user an easy way of maintaining thread safety... For RNGs, we could provide a convenient interface for each domain to have its own RNG, maybe we can get inspiration from JAX's key splitting (?). I'd have to think more about the AD part, it seems non-trivial.

…

On Jan 29 (08:55), J. Roger Zhao wrote: Thanks for asking. We are beginning to migrate to OCaml 5.0 while removing certain parts of Owl. Currently the code compiles and runs fine on 5.0, but we will see if any more change is required. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: #628 (comment) You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Message ID: ***@***.***>