Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Any plan to suport XcmPaymentApi? #507

Closed
boundless-forest opened this issue Oct 29, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

Any plan to suport XcmPaymentApi? #507

boundless-forest opened this issue Oct 29, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@boundless-forest
Copy link

paritytech/polkadot-sdk#3607

We are developing a platform for mainstream parachains to facilitate XCM transfers. I am curious if there are plans to support the XcmPaymentApi for the node.

@prayagd
Copy link
Collaborator

prayagd commented Nov 5, 2024

@boundless-forest Thanks for raising this ticket cc @pendulum-chain/devs

@TorstenStueber
Copy link
Contributor

@boundless-forest definitely sounds good. I see that this has been included in the polkadot-sdk release 1.10.0 (correct?) and we would need to run at least on that version of the sdk?

@boundless-forest
Copy link
Author

It included in the stable2407 branch. Have you upgraded to this version?

@ebma
Copy link
Member

ebma commented Jan 21, 2025

Hey @boundless-forest. Unfortunately we are far from it. We are currently in the process of rolling out runtime upgrades that update the dependencies to polkadot-sdk v1.6.0. We are trying to catch up with the polkadot releases but there's always quite a maintenance overhead. It will probably take us many more months until we upgrade the dependencies to stable2407.

@boundless-forest
Copy link
Author

I got it. Please let me know once you have upgraded later, ParaLink will support your chain's assets automatically.

@ebma ebma closed this as completed Jan 22, 2025
@ebma ebma closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jan 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants