Controller name selection direction

[yuranos]

At the moment, the very last segment inside the root path is taken as a basis for controller name:
RAML:

/errors/{errorId}:
  get:
    description: Get all supported errors
    responses:
      200:
        body:
           application/json:
             type: ErrorInfo[]

would generate controller named:
ErrorIdController(it was actually errorIdController, just a couple of days ago before #215 fix).
While it's not critical and can easily be circumvented with:

/errors:
  /{errorId};

wouldn't it be nice to be able to set a flag inside a plugin that will use a reverse traversal for Controller naming?
What do you think, guys?

[stojsavljevic]

Just to make something clear:

/errors/{errorId}:

produces ErrorIdErrorController while

/errors:
	/{errorId}:

produces ErrorController.
Am I correct @yuranos?

Bear in mind that path variable influences this behavior since for:

/abc:
  /efg:

and

/abc/efg: 

it's always the same - EfgAbcController.

So I'm not sure what kind of 'reverse traversal' you have in mind.
There is already reverseOrderInClassNames config option which can control the way controller names are generated. With <reverseOrderInClassNames>false</reverseOrderInClassNames> you'll get AbcEfgController instead.

[yuranos]

@stojsavljevic , are you talking about RAML 1.0?
I have just tried reverseOrderInClassNames option for both:

/errors:
  /mycontroller:
    post:
       description: Checks and adds booking to customer
       queryParameters:
            siteKey : SiteKey
       body:
           application/json:
              type: AddBookingRequest
       responses:
            201:
              body:
                application/json:
                  type: BookingDetailsDto

and

/errors/mycontroller:
    post:
       description: Checks and adds booking to customer
       queryParameters:
            siteKey : SiteKey
       body:
           application/json:
              type: AddBookingRequest
       responses:
            201:
              body:
                application/json:
                  type: BookingDetailsDto

and the resulting name is always the same:
MycontrollerController

To be honest, I was not aware of that option, but it seems not to work as expected, or my expectation is different to the designed one.
I also haven't seen anything like EfgAbcController. As you can see in my example, class name always contains only one segment. What are we doing differently?

[stojsavljevic]

Sorry I didn't explain it well.

So there are 2 config options:

• resourceDepthInClassNames - number of resource levels used for controller name generation; default is 1
• reverseOrderInClassNames - option to reverse the order of resource levels used for name generation. Obviously, you need to have resourceDepthInClassNames > 1 for this option to have impact; default is false

I was using resourceDepthInClassNames=2 and reverseOrderInClassNames=true in my abc/efg example. Sorry for the confusion.

To get back to your original question - we can consider ErrorIdController name a bug. It should be ErrorController like with:

/errors:
  /{errorId}