Super high rate on missing data despite using a proxy script

[a4z]

Hi, I have a site where I use Plausible (swedencpp.se)

Recently, I updated the site and added a server site counter to see which routes are called and how often
When comparing those numbers to the number of plausible reports, about 70% of the page calls I see on the backend are not reported by Plausible. Again, it's not missing 20 to 30 percent; it's just capturing about 20 to 30 percent, so opposite to what the docs say.

And I can also live monitor that my browser, for example, when visiting the page, is not tracked by Plausible (does not show as a current user)

It is really sad, because the only reason I do this is to see if the page, or parts of the page, are even worth the effort.
That's the only reason why I use analytics, but it seems, default browser privacy settings are so advanced these days ...

Also, the scripting part to use

window.plausible=window.plausible||function(){(plausible.q=plausible.q||[]).push(arguments)},plausible.init=plausible.init||function(i){plausible.o=i||{}};
  plausible.init()

doesn't the word plausible not cause browsers to stop / ignore that script?
Is that still enought to not get ignored ?

Or do I do something wrong?

[Arrekin]

I just checked for my case as I was interested, and also didn't see myself online. I check the network, and it seems UBlock Origin is blocking plausible by default. I would assume that will cause quite big discrepancies in reporting.

[a4z]

I think that also without ublock(origin), some browsers with default tracking protection will probably also block plausible

[cnkk]

hey @a4z, please reach out to our support team hello@plausible.io, they can look into your specific case and help!