-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 378
fix: resolve incorrect author caused by multiple preRuntime logs #6230
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could be mistaken, but from a distance this fix seems a bit brittle. Are we certain that performing
engine.extractAuthoron an entry that doesn't actually have an author will always returnundefined? Aren't we chancing it a bit? Are we certain that the underlying encoded data can't yield a false-positive? What if one day theextractAuthorimplementation changes?Again, I'm not familiar with the implementation of
extractAuthor. However, I think that it would be best to be more assertive and to first find out which one is the correct entry from where to extract the author, and only then get the author using theextractAuthormethod.It's just a thought. Please take it with a pinch of salt, because I really am not familiar with this logic in PJS. 🙂
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great question! Your concern about relying on
undefinedreturns is valid. However, the current approach is safe because extractAuthor() validates the engine identifier first, before interpreting any payload data:api/packages/types/src/generic/ConsensusEngineId.ts
Lines 92 to 107 in 241a1a3
Example: When we call extractAuthor() on a CMLS preRuntime log:
This means the engine ID acts as a gatekeeper -- random bytes in unrecognized engine payloads can't produce false positives because the engine string is checked before any data interpretation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with the reasoning here. 👍