diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index a11e579..97c37a4 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -1,21 +1,21 @@ -# PyCon TW 2023 Reviewer Guide 審稿指南 +# PyCon TW 2024 Reviewer Guide 審稿指南 (English below) -您好，歡迎您加入 PyCon TW 2023 審稿的行列。請點選 [審稿指南](reviewer-guide.md) 開始了解審稿流程。 +您好，歡迎您加入 PyCon TW 2024 審稿的行列。請點選 [審稿指南](reviewer-guide.md) 開始了解審稿流程。 本次審稿的表定時程如下： -+ Mar 31: Call for Proposals 截止 -+ Apr 1 ~ Apr 22: 第一階段審稿 -+ May 1 ~ May 15: 投稿者修稿階段 -+ May 16 ~ Jun 6: 第二階段審稿 -+ Jun 13: 完成入選、備取、拒絕稿件清單 ++ Apr 8: Call for Proposals 截止 ++ Apr 9 ~ Apr 30: 第一階段審稿 ++ May 7 ~ May 20: 投稿者修稿階段 ++ May 21 ~ Jun 3: 第二階段審稿 ++ Jun 10: 完成入選、備取、拒絕稿件清單 -Hi, welcome to PyCon TW 2023 proposals review. Please visit [Proposal Review Process](reviewer-guide.en.md) to read the detailed description of the review process. +Hi, welcome to PyCon TW 2024 proposals review. Please visit [Proposal Review Process](reviewer-guide.en.md) to read the detailed description of the review process. Our schedule is as follows: -+ Mar 31: End of Call for Proposals -+ Apr 1 ~ Apr 22: First round review -+ May 1 ~ May 15: Modification stage for submitters -+ May 16 ~ Jun 6: Second round review -+ Jun 13: Announce accepted and rejected proposals, and waiting list ++ Apr 8: End of Call for Proposals ++ Apr 9 ~ Apr 30: First round review ++ May 7 ~ May 20: Modification stage for submitters ++ May 21 ~ Jun 3: Second round review ++ Jun 10: Announce accepted and rejected proposals, and waiting list diff --git a/reviewer-guide.en.md b/reviewer-guide.en.md index 6a40d6a..4fdb996 100644 --- a/reviewer-guide.en.md +++ b/reviewer-guide.en.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Proposal Review Process -In PyCon TW 2023, our proposal review process is based on **Two Round** review. +In PyCon TW 2024, our proposal review process is based on **Two Round** review. Please login to PyCon TW reviewing system to review, and we **WILL NOT** reveal your identity in the whole review process. @@ -27,11 +27,11 @@ After review, we will email the second round votes and comments to authors. If y # Notice + Giving **constructive comments** is helpful for the review process, and helps author in the modification stage. -+ When rating, please put yourself into author's shoes, refer to [《How to Propose a Talk》](https://tw.pycon.org/2023/en-us/speaking/talk) about good ideas and bad ideas as judging criteria. We also welcome reviewers to give us more advice on how to distinguish good and bad ideas for proposals. ++ When rating, please put yourself into author's shoes, refer to [《How to Propose a Talk》](https://tw.pycon.org/2024/en-us/speaking/talk) about good ideas and bad ideas as judging criteria. We also welcome reviewers to give us more advice on how to distinguish good and bad ideas for proposals. + Please vote and comment according to **Python Level** of the proposal. -For Python Level, please refer to [《How to Choose the Python Level》](https://tw.pycon.org/2023/en-us/speaking/talk)。 +For Python Level, please refer to [《How to Choose the Python Level》](https://tw.pycon.org/2024/en-us/speaking/talk)。 + Although accepting or rejecting is our standard as reviewers, but for PyCon TW, it's not only about accepting and rejecting, but also to foster the community. Please judge in a mindset of **how to make the proposal better**, not just yes or no. -+ Even though the review process is anonymous, we should respect author and follow PyCon TW [Code of Conduct](https://tw.pycon.org/2023/en-us/about/code-of-conduct). ++ Even though the review process is anonymous, we should respect author and follow PyCon TW [Code of Conduct](https://tw.pycon.org/2024/en-us/about/code-of-conduct). # Details + Language options for proposals can be: English talk and non-English talk. When an author choose to do **English talk**, please use English to comment. @@ -43,10 +43,10 @@ For Python Level, please refer to [《How to Choose the Python Level》](https:/ There are four different vote options: -1, -0, +0, +1. Each vote option's meaning is as follows: -* **-1**：Strong Reject This **SHOULD NOT** be in PyCon TW 2023 +* **-1**：Strong Reject This **SHOULD NOT** be in PyCon TW 2024 * **-0**：Weak Reject * **+0**：Weak Accept -* **+1**：Strong Accept This **SHOULD** be in PyCon TW 2023 +* **+1**：Strong Accept This **SHOULD** be in PyCon TW 2024 # Q & A diff --git a/reviewer-guide.md b/reviewer-guide.md index 7806474..2e43caa 100644 --- a/reviewer-guide.md +++ b/reviewer-guide.md @@ -26,11 +26,11 @@ Review 結束後，我們會整理第二回合的評分與評論，以匿名的 # 審稿注意事項 + 評分時給予**建設性的回饋**有助於評分的收束，以及修改階段時的參考價值，並讓投稿者有所成長。 -+ 評分時，請站在投稿者的角度，參考[《如何投稿》](https://tw.pycon.org/2023/zh-hant/speaking/talk)裡投稿的好主意與投稿的壞主意作主要評斷。當然 PyCon TW 也很歡迎審稿者給我們更多建議，告訴我們什麼樣是投稿的好主意與壞主意。 ++ 評分時，請站在投稿者的角度，參考[《如何投稿》](https://tw.pycon.org/2024/zh-hant/speaking/talk)裡投稿的好主意與投稿的壞主意作主要評斷。當然 PyCon TW 也很歡迎審稿者給我們更多建議，告訴我們什麼樣是投稿的好主意與壞主意。 + 稿件有分三個不同的 Python 難易度，請**根據對應的難易度來審稿**。 -難易度的判斷可以參考官網[《如何設定投稿的 Python 難易度？》](https://tw.pycon.org/2023/zh-hant/speaking/talk)介紹。 +難易度的判斷可以參考官網[《如何設定投稿的 Python 難易度？》](https://tw.pycon.org/2024/zh-hant/speaking/talk)介紹。 + 需要注意一點的是，雖然我們是審稿者，接受與拒絕是評分的標準。但對 PyCon TW 來說其實不是接受與拒絕，而是一個長期社群的培養。試著站在 PyCon TW 與投稿者的立場，評論以**如何將一份投稿變的更好**為方向，而非一個法官決定判刑與否。 -+ 即使匿名，請尊重投稿者並遵守大會的[行為準則](https://tw.pycon.org/2023/zh-hant/about/code-of-conduct)。 ++ 即使匿名，請尊重投稿者並遵守大會的[行為準則](https://tw.pycon.org/2024/zh-hant/about/code-of-conduct)。 # 審稿細節 + 演講語言可分為：英文演講與非英文演講。當投稿者選擇**英文演講**時，請使用英文作為審稿回覆。 @@ -39,10 +39,10 @@ Review 結束後，我們會整理第二回合的評分與評論，以匿名的 ### 評分方式 評分只有四種：-1、-0、+0、+1。 解釋各評分的意義： -* **-1**：strong reject 這講題「不該」出現在 PyCon TW 2023 +* **-1**：strong reject 這講題「不該」出現在 PyCon TW 2024 * **-0**：weak reject * **+0**：weak accept -* **+1**：strong accept 這議題「務必」出現在 PyCon TW 2023 +* **+1**：strong accept 這議題「務必」出現在 PyCon TW 2024 # Q & A **Q**: 因為某些原因，我能知道或猜得到某個稿件的作者是誰。基於第一階段的身份不公開原則，這可能會有利益衝突，那麼我有資格審查這份稿件嗎？