Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Website Oct 11th makeover #14

Open
canyon289 opened this issue Oct 11, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Website Oct 11th makeover #14

canyon289 opened this issue Oct 11, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@canyon289
Copy link
Contributor

canyon289 commented Oct 11, 2020

Creating this issue thread to share and distill priorities for the website.

The things I think are useful in rank priority

  1. Mobile friendly
  2. Includes testimonials or evidence of value
  3. Has a logo or some sort of anchoring visual identity we can share across signatures, documents whatever
  4. Looks "better"

These are all proposals, interested in seeing other peoples stack ranks so we can figure out what we want.

Creating this issue thread both so we don't waste time doing the wrong thing, and also for practicality of coding so we can avoid merge conflicts and duplicate efforts from the outset

@ericmjl
Copy link
Collaborator

ericmjl commented Oct 11, 2020

Mobile friendly

Bootstrap v4 is the CSS engine for the website, so if you try viewing the website on a mobile phone, it should resize properly.

I think there are some warts, though, e.g. our headshots cards get humongous. It's got to do with the CSS. CSS is some form of trickery I don't fully wrap my head around 😅

Includes testimonials or evidence of value

A section's up and ready! Just waiting for testimonials to come in.

Looks "better"

Counter-propose that you add a bit of detail in your original post 😄. Otherwise, it's not actionable the way "mobile-friendly" or "needs testimonials" is.

@canyon289
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah these were not meant to be actionable but more strategic. If folks tend to agree with one item being the top idea we can split it apart into more actionable steps

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants