Replies: 4 comments
-
From your toot I opened the page on a not-full-width window and then added 900. I liked that. In full width a higher value is probably better. But can't you take a page from bootstrap etc and do something like '90% width as longer as device width is larger than x' with a common cutoff these frameworks use between mobile, tablet, browser? Good UI design is hard. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The builds, articles, and api pages look fine at any width, IMO, including the smallest. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Decided to go with 1440 for the new front-end. This is the default resolution for the smallest (13-inch) macbook air M1, and also the width used by mozilla: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Content_categories |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Deployed part of the new front-end for universe pages and individual package homepages, for example: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Currently the r-universe dashboards use fluid-width, which might look weird on very large screens. Some people suggest we switch to a fixed max-width.
What makes this challenging is that the content of different universes varies a lot. A fixed width will apply across all packages and tabs, so we should try it with different packages and universes to make sure it is sufficiently wide for a variety of content.
Both are possible. Some examples:
I added a feature to experiment with fixed max-width. If you got to a universe homepage and press
w
on your keyboard you can enter a value to test how it looks with a given max-width.Some random pages to test :
Try a few values and suggest what you think looks nice.
10 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions