Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More normalization #18

Open
sigven opened this issue Jun 13, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

More normalization #18

sigven opened this issue Jun 13, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@sigven
Copy link

sigven commented Jun 13, 2017

Hi,
I am still struggling to understand which normalization procedure would make sense for WES versus WGS, both from your previous discussions, and also from the documentation that goes with the deconstructSigs R package. According to the package docs: " For exome data, the 'exome2genome' method is appropriate for the signatures included in this package. For whole genome data, use the 'default' method to obtain consistent results.". From the deconstructSigs GitHub page it is however stated that "For exome data, the default method is appropriate for the signatures included in this package.". I am using the 'signatures.cosmic' as the set of known signatures.

best,
Sigve

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant