Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pi5 failed to contact RP1 firmware #6642

Open
llllllllqq opened this issue Feb 1, 2025 · 31 comments
Open

Pi5 failed to contact RP1 firmware #6642

llllllllqq opened this issue Feb 1, 2025 · 31 comments

Comments

@llllllllqq
Copy link

llllllllqq commented Feb 1, 2025

Describe the bug

dmesg says:

...
rp1-pio 1f00178000.pio: error -ENOENT: failed to contact RP1 firmware [ 3.957885] rp1-pio: probe of 1f00178000.pio failed with error -2
...

Although nothing strange occurred.
The OS still works fine without reboot.

Steps to reproduce the behaviour

It randomly occurs after sudo reboot --halt and then manually press the on-board power button to power on (with default eeprom config).

It also randomly occurs when use raspi-config to change power off behavior to "full power off" and then reboot/poweroff. (Sorry I cannot remember whether it is reboot or poweroff)

Update: It also occurs after a suddenly plug-out the usb-c power cable and then plug-in back.
It seems only poweroff-related behaviors will trigger this bug. I tested 30 times reboot, no bugs occurred.
Update2: reboot can indeed also trigger this bug, only less frequent.

Device (s)

Raspberry Pi 5

System

Raspberry Pi reference 2024-11-19 Generated using pi-gen, https://github.com/RPi-Distro/pi-gen, 891df1e21ed2b6099a2e6a13e26c91dea44b34d4, stage4

2025/01/22 00:16:51
Copyright (c) 2012 Broadcom version a7753063 (release) (embedded)

Linux rpi5 6.6.74+rpt-rpi-2712 #1 SMP PREEMPT Debian 1:6.6.74-1+rpt1 (2025-01-27) aarch64 GNU/Linux

Logs

1.txt

Additional context

Can it be safely ignored?

@pelwell
Copy link
Contributor

pelwell commented Feb 3, 2025

That's interesting - it looks like a dependency/ordering issue, and not one I've seen before:

[    3.922665] rp1-pio 1f00178000.pio: error -ENOENT: failed to contact RP1 firmware
[    3.922671] rp1-pio: probe of 1f00178000.pio failed with error -2
...
[    3.932284] rp1-firmware rp1_firmware: RP1 Firmware version eb39cfd516f8c90628aa9d91f52370aade5d0a55

I get:

[   13.445656] rp1-firmware rp1_firmware: RP1 Firmware version eb39cfd516f8c90628aa9d91f52370aade5d0a55
[   13.550428] rp1-pio 1f00178000.pio: Created instance as pio0

The code for communicating with the firmware exists in the firmware module, so I thought that would enforce an ordering. Some investigation is required.

@llllllllqq
Copy link
Author

That's interesting - it looks like a dependency/ordering issue, and not one I've seen before:

[    3.922665] rp1-pio 1f00178000.pio: error -ENOENT: failed to contact RP1 firmware
[    3.922671] rp1-pio: probe of 1f00178000.pio failed with error -2
...
[    3.932284] rp1-firmware rp1_firmware: RP1 Firmware version eb39cfd516f8c90628aa9d91f52370aade5d0a55

I get:

[   13.445656] rp1-firmware rp1_firmware: RP1 Firmware version eb39cfd516f8c90628aa9d91f52370aade5d0a55
[   13.550428] rp1-pio 1f00178000.pio: Created instance as pio0

The code for communicating with the firmware exists in the firmware module, so I thought that would enforce an ordering. Some investigation is required.

Thanks for your reply.
Here is my dmesg when the rp1&pio works fine.
I hope it can help to investigate this issue.

normal.txt

@pelwell
Copy link
Contributor

pelwell commented Feb 3, 2025

Yes - in the working case the order is reversed:

[    3.955929] rp1-firmware rp1_firmware: RP1 Firmware version eb39cfd516f8c90628aa9d91f52370aade5d0a55
[    3.961971] vc4-drm axi:gpu: bound 107c580000.hvs (ops vc4_hvs_ops [vc4])
[    3.967397] rp1-pio 1f00178000.pio: Created instance as pio0

@aBUGSworstnightmare-rpi
Copy link
Contributor

[ 5.557565] rp1-pio 1f00178000.pio: error -ENOENT: failed to contact RP1 firmware [ 5.557571] rp1-pio: probe of 1f00178000.pio failed with error -2 [ 5.558534] rp1-firmware rp1_firmware: RP1 Firmware version eb39cfd516f8c90628aa9d91f52370aade5d0a55

Seeing that on reboot as well /custom kernel on a Pi5 DUT, trying to get an overlay to work)

Linux Pi5uSDDUT 6.6.74-v8-16k+ #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Feb 2 10:41:23 CET 2025 aarch64 GNU/Linux Revision : c04170 Serial : cb30eb1fd7e7e672 Model : Raspberry Pi 5 Model B Rev 1.0

@pelwell
Copy link
Contributor

pelwell commented Feb 3, 2025

It's really strange. I can't get it to fail in that way without hacks - even with a massive delay in the firmware driver, the pio driver waits. Anyway, I'm just testing a fix.

@aBUGSworstnightmare-rpi
Copy link
Contributor

seems quite random. Seen it frequently on reboots (running 'sudo reboot' on CLI)

pelwell added a commit to pelwell/linux that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2025
If the RP1 firmware has reported an error then return that from the PIO
probe function, otherwise defer the probing.

Link: raspberrypi#6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
pelwell added a commit to pelwell/linux that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2025
To avoid pointless retries, let the probe function succeed if the
firmware interface is configured correctly but the firmware is
incompatible. The value of the private drvdata field holds the outcome.

Link: raspberrypi#6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
@mayo228
Copy link

mayo228 commented Feb 3, 2025

is there a way to fix this? I keep getting this error and I can't boot the OS, should I be worried that I will loose data on my raspberry?

@pelwell
Copy link
Contributor

pelwell commented Feb 3, 2025

I don't understand why this affecting some people while I can't reproduce it without hacking the driver, but regardless, #6645 should fix the issue. After about 40 minutes you should be able to install a trial kernel with sudo rpi-update pulls/6645, after first backing up any important data.

@pelwell
Copy link
Contributor

pelwell commented Feb 3, 2025

And no, you shouldn't worry - it would only affect you if you wanted to use piolib to drive the GPIOs.

@aBUGSworstnightmare-rpi
Copy link
Contributor

aBUGSworstnightmare-rpi commented Feb 3, 2025

I have no idea if and how below is related but I just wanted to state that I'm not making use of piolib for accessing GPIO's.

[   13.678330] ieee80211 phy0: brcmf_p2p_send_action_frame: Unknown Frame: category 0xa, action 0x8
[   15.374753] Bluetooth: RFCOMM TTY layer initialized
[   15.374765] Bluetooth: RFCOMM socket layer initialized
[   15.374772] Bluetooth: RFCOMM ver 1.11
[   27.660651] brcmfmac: brcmf_set_channel: set chanspec 0xd022 fail, reason -52
[   27.768681] brcmfmac: brcmf_set_channel: set chanspec 0xd026 fail, reason -52
[   27.872656] brcmfmac: brcmf_set_channel: set chanspec 0xd02a fail, reason -52
[   27.976661] brcmfmac: brcmf_set_channel: set chanspec 0xd02e fail, reason -52
[   29.636663] brcmfmac: brcmf_set_channel: set chanspec 0xd090 fail, reason -52
[   29.636875] brcmfmac: brcmf_set_channel: set chanspec 0xd095 fail, reason -52
[   29.637196] brcmfmac: brcmf_set_channel: set chanspec 0xd099 fail, reason -52
[   29.637400] brcmfmac: brcmf_set_channel: set chanspec 0xd09d fail, reason -52
[   29.637594] brcmfmac: brcmf_set_channel: set chanspec 0xd0a1 fail, reason -52
[   29.637791] brcmfmac: brcmf_set_channel: set chanspec 0xd0a5 fail, reason -52

@pelwell
Copy link
Contributor

pelwell commented Feb 3, 2025

I have no idea if and how below is related

You should know that WiFi and Bluetooth information and warning messages are unrelated.

pelwell added a commit to pelwell/linux that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2025
To avoid pointless retries, let the probe function succeed if the
firmware interface is configured correctly but the firmware is
incompatible. The value of the private drvdata field holds the outcome.

Link: raspberrypi#6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
@llllllllqq
Copy link
Author

It seems after applying sudo rpi-update pulls/6645, this issue disappeared. (I tested about 10 times reboot/halt/suddenly poweroff). Thanks for your work! If anything strange found, I'll post here.

BTW, can I safely stay at this firmware and wait for the next stable release offered by apt? Or do I need a sudo apt install --reinstall raspi-firmware to restore first before the next stable release?

@pelwell
Copy link
Contributor

pelwell commented Feb 4, 2025

You should be fine with this kernel until the next proper release - I'm not aware of any new issues.

pelwell added a commit to pelwell/linux that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2025
If the RP1 firmware has reported an error then return that from the PIO
probe function, otherwise defer the probing.

Link: raspberrypi#6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
pelwell added a commit to pelwell/linux that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2025
To avoid pointless retries, let the probe function succeed if the
firmware interface is configured correctly but the firmware is
incompatible. The value of the private drvdata field holds the outcome.

Link: raspberrypi#6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
pelwell added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2025
If the RP1 firmware has reported an error then return that from the PIO
probe function, otherwise defer the probing.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
pelwell added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2025
To avoid pointless retries, let the probe function succeed if the
firmware interface is configured correctly but the firmware is
incompatible. The value of the private drvdata field holds the outcome.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
pelwell added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2025
If the RP1 firmware has reported an error then return that from the PIO
probe function, otherwise defer the probing.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
pelwell added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2025
To avoid pointless retries, let the probe function succeed if the
firmware interface is configured correctly but the firmware is
incompatible. The value of the private drvdata field holds the outcome.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
pelwell added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2025
If the RP1 firmware has reported an error then return that from the PIO
probe function, otherwise defer the probing.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
pelwell added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2025
To avoid pointless retries, let the probe function succeed if the
firmware interface is configured correctly but the firmware is
incompatible. The value of the private drvdata field holds the outcome.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
pelwell added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2025
If the RP1 firmware has reported an error then return that from the PIO
probe function, otherwise defer the probing.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
pelwell added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 4, 2025
To avoid pointless retries, let the probe function succeed if the
firmware interface is configured correctly but the firmware is
incompatible. The value of the private drvdata field holds the outcome.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
@randomMesh
Copy link

I can confirm the error happens on my PI 5 too:

[    0.692347] rp1-pio 1f00178000.pio: error -ENOENT: failed to contact RP1 firmware
[    0.692370] rp1-pio: probe of 1f00178000.pio failed with error -2

I am running the latest firmware:

BOOTLOADER: up to date
   CURRENT: Wed 22 Jan 00:16:51 UTC 2025 (1737505011)
    LATEST: Wed 22 Jan 00:16:51 UTC 2025 (1737505011)
   RELEASE: latest (/usr/lib/firmware/raspberrypi/bootloader-2712/latest)
            Use raspi-config to change the release.

@helpful-emu57
Copy link

A week ago I also started receiving these errors during bootup:

rp1-pio 1f00178000.pio: error -ENOENT: failed to contact RP1 firmware

At the same time I also started getting protocol errors for the wireless mouse and wireless keyboard
logitech-hidpp-device - hidpp_root_get_ protocol_version: received protocol error 0x08
(Although - both devices continued to work appropriately.)

Changing to wired devices there are no mouse or keyboard errors but still have the rp1-pio error

I have performed the "sudo rpi-update pulls/6645" and no change was observed.

@pelwell
Copy link
Contributor

pelwell commented Feb 9, 2025

What does rpi-eeprom-update show?

pelwell added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2025
Support for the RP1 firmware mailbox API is rolling out to Pi 5 EEPROM
images. For most users, the fact that the PIO is not available is no
cause for alarm. Change the message to a warning, so that it does not
appear with "quiet" in cmdline.txt.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
pelwell added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2025
Support for the RP1 firmware mailbox API is rolling out to Pi 5 EEPROM
images. For most users, the fact that the PIO is not available is no
cause for alarm. Change the message to a warning, so that it does not
appear with "quiet" in cmdline.txt.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
pelwell added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 25, 2025
Support for the RP1 firmware mailbox API is rolling out to Pi 5 EEPROM
images. For most users, the fact that the PIO is not available is no
cause for alarm. Change the message to a warning, so that it does not
appear with "quiet" in cmdline.txt.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
sanderhollaar pushed a commit to sanderhollaar/linux that referenced this issue Feb 27, 2025
Support for the RP1 firmware mailbox API is rolling out to Pi 5 EEPROM
images. For most users, the fact that the PIO is not available is no
cause for alarm. Change the message to a warning, so that it does not
appear with "quiet" in cmdline.txt.

Link: raspberrypi#6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2025
If the RP1 firmware has reported an error then return that from the PIO
probe function, otherwise defer the probing.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2025
To avoid pointless retries, let the probe function succeed if the
firmware interface is configured correctly but the firmware is
incompatible. The value of the private drvdata field holds the outcome.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 28, 2025
Support for the RP1 firmware mailbox API is rolling out to Pi 5 EEPROM
images. For most users, the fact that the PIO is not available is no
cause for alarm. Change the message to a warning, so that it does not
appear with "quiet" in cmdline.txt.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
@ozapft
Copy link

ozapft commented Mar 2, 2025

I also had the error message “failed to contact rp1 firmware“.
So I installed a new sd card as a test. This error message didn't appear with this new sd card, even though it uses the same kernel. When comparing the /boot/firmware directory, I noticed that the initramfs files on the older card were ~17 MB in size and the two new ones were 12.7 MB. After copying the two files from the new sd card to the old one, the error disappeared.

popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2025
If the RP1 firmware has reported an error then return that from the PIO
probe function, otherwise defer the probing.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2025
To avoid pointless retries, let the probe function succeed if the
firmware interface is configured correctly but the firmware is
incompatible. The value of the private drvdata field holds the outcome.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2025
Support for the RP1 firmware mailbox API is rolling out to Pi 5 EEPROM
images. For most users, the fact that the PIO is not available is no
cause for alarm. Change the message to a warning, so that it does not
appear with "quiet" in cmdline.txt.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
wanghao75 pushed a commit to openeuler-mirror/raspberrypi-kernel that referenced this issue Mar 5, 2025
If the RP1 firmware has reported an error then return that from the PIO
probe function, otherwise defer the probing.

Link: raspberrypi/linux#6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
wanghao75 pushed a commit to openeuler-mirror/raspberrypi-kernel that referenced this issue Mar 5, 2025
To avoid pointless retries, let the probe function succeed if the
firmware interface is configured correctly but the firmware is
incompatible. The value of the private drvdata field holds the outcome.

Link: raspberrypi/linux#6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
wanghao75 pushed a commit to openeuler-mirror/raspberrypi-kernel that referenced this issue Mar 5, 2025
Support for the RP1 firmware mailbox API is rolling out to Pi 5 EEPROM
images. For most users, the fact that the PIO is not available is no
cause for alarm. Change the message to a warning, so that it does not
appear with "quiet" in cmdline.txt.

Link: raspberrypi/linux#6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
@moodeaudio
Copy link

I'm also seeing this error sometimes, but only on Pi5 with NVMe (non-boot) drive attached.

RPiOS: 12.9 Bookworm 64-bit | Linux: 6.6.74 64-bit (built with Pi-Gen)
ii  raspi-firmware   1:1.20250305-1  all  Raspberry Pi family GPU firmware and bootloaders

I have 2 such Pi5's and one symptom is that sometimes reboot or power off does not complete and the Pi never reaches the halt state (red LED). Two other Pi5's w/o NVMe drive are fine.

Pi5 with NVMe drive

pi@moode9:~ $ dmesg | grep rp1
[    0.805353] /axi/pcie@120000/rp1: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /axi/pcie@120000/rp1
[    0.823933] /axi/pcie@120000/rp1: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /axi/pcie@120000/rp1
[    2.284970] rp1 0001:01:00.0: bar0 len 0x4000, start 0x1f00410000, end 0x1f00413fff, flags, 0x40200
[    2.294054] rp1 0001:01:00.0: bar1 len 0x400000, start 0x1f00000000, end 0x1f003fffff, flags, 0x40200
[    2.303317] rp1 0001:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
[    2.309638] rp1 0001:01:00.0: chip_id 0x20001927
[    2.318624] genirq: irq_chip rp1_irq_chip did not update eff. affinity mask of irq 106
[    5.742889] rp1-firmware: probe of rp1_firmware failed with error -110
[    5.749497] rp1-pio 1f00178000.pio: error -ENOENT: failed to contact RP1 firmware
[    5.749505] rp1-pio: probe of 1f00178000.pio failed with error -2
pi@moode9:~ $

Pi5 w/o NVMe drive

pi@moode:~ $ dmesg | grep rp1
[    1.015138] /axi/pcie@120000/rp1: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /axi/pcie@120000/rp1
[    1.033523] /axi/pcie@120000/rp1: Fixed dependency cycle(s) with /axi/pcie@120000/rp1
[    2.137633] rp1 0000:01:00.0: bar0 len 0x4000, start 0x1f00410000, end 0x1f00413fff, flags, 0x40200
[    2.146719] rp1 0000:01:00.0: bar1 len 0x400000, start 0x1f00000000, end 0x1f003fffff, flags, 0x40200
[    2.155981] rp1 0000:01:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
[    2.162270] rp1 0000:01:00.0: chip_id 0x20001927
[    2.170959] genirq: irq_chip rp1_irq_chip did not update eff. affinity mask of irq 100
[    5.009561] rp1-firmware rp1_firmware: RP1 Firmware version eb39cfd516f8c90628aa9d91f52370aade5d0a55
[    5.237119] rp1-pio 1f00178000.pio: Created instance as pio0
pi@moode:~ $

PCIe controller: Pimoroni NVMe Base for Raspberry Pi 5
https://www.adafruit.com/product/5845?gad_source=1&gbraid=0AAAAADx9JvT2Uc1scGbd8pfLnNHlqrIyp&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIz8PE47P6iwMVo15_AB2ZfhpaEAQYASABEgKY__D_BwE

NVMe stick: Crucial P3 1TB PCIe Gen3 3D NAND NVMe M.2 SSD
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1710645-REG/crucial_ct1000p3ssd8_1tb_p3_nvme_pcie.html/?ap=y&ap=y&smp=y&smp=y&store=420&lsft=BI%3A5451&gad_source=1&gbraid=0AAAAAD7yMh0CnuDG9lQosL1qx1hNsryh6&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIiaSZwLT6iwMVHDStBh17LgH0EAQYASABEgLYhvD_BwE

@raspberrypi raspberrypi deleted a comment from hillphantom Mar 8, 2025
@pelwell
Copy link
Contributor

pelwell commented Mar 8, 2025

It's possible that the presence of the NVME drive changes the timing of the boot procedure. Between 6.6.74 and 6.6.75 the RP1 PIO and firmware drivers were improved to cope with arbitrary startup order. I can't tell whether or not the kernel you have includes that patch, but you can ensure that it does by running sudo rpi-update 1705add.

@moodeaudio
Copy link

Makes sense. The kernel we use is the official release package so not patched.

popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2025
If the RP1 firmware has reported an error then return that from the PIO
probe function, otherwise defer the probing.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2025
To avoid pointless retries, let the probe function succeed if the
firmware interface is configured correctly but the firmware is
incompatible. The value of the private drvdata field holds the outcome.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2025
Support for the RP1 firmware mailbox API is rolling out to Pi 5 EEPROM
images. For most users, the fact that the PIO is not available is no
cause for alarm. Change the message to a warning, so that it does not
appear with "quiet" in cmdline.txt.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2025
If the RP1 firmware has reported an error then return that from the PIO
probe function, otherwise defer the probing.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2025
To avoid pointless retries, let the probe function succeed if the
firmware interface is configured correctly but the firmware is
incompatible. The value of the private drvdata field holds the outcome.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2025
Support for the RP1 firmware mailbox API is rolling out to Pi 5 EEPROM
images. For most users, the fact that the PIO is not available is no
cause for alarm. Change the message to a warning, so that it does not
appear with "quiet" in cmdline.txt.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2025
If the RP1 firmware has reported an error then return that from the PIO
probe function, otherwise defer the probing.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2025
To avoid pointless retries, let the probe function succeed if the
firmware interface is configured correctly but the firmware is
incompatible. The value of the private drvdata field holds the outcome.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2025
Support for the RP1 firmware mailbox API is rolling out to Pi 5 EEPROM
images. For most users, the fact that the PIO is not available is no
cause for alarm. Change the message to a warning, so that it does not
appear with "quiet" in cmdline.txt.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2025
If the RP1 firmware has reported an error then return that from the PIO
probe function, otherwise defer the probing.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2025
To avoid pointless retries, let the probe function succeed if the
firmware interface is configured correctly but the firmware is
incompatible. The value of the private drvdata field holds the outcome.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
popcornmix pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2025
Support for the RP1 firmware mailbox API is rolling out to Pi 5 EEPROM
images. For most users, the fact that the PIO is not available is no
cause for alarm. Change the message to a warning, so that it does not
appear with "quiet" in cmdline.txt.

Link: #6642

Signed-off-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests