You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since BuckleScript officially ships with Belt as an alternative standard library (and officially recommends its use), Belt should be available in ReBench.
I am not sure how to go about integrating it at this time, but it would be a very welcomed improvement!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This uses bs-in-a-box and is just a matter of replacing the vendored compiler and stdlib bundle there as long as the interface is still the same. Unfortunately I suspect it's not. I also think the process of building it has changed a lot.
I think @ryyppy and @thangngoc89 know the process best these days. Maybe they can chime in, or have plans to do something similar to this elsewhere.
I agree, rebench is so useful to quickly benchmark BS code, having access to Belt would be a game changer because Belt implementation usually makes it much faster than the JS lib and a bit faster than Stdlib.
I don't know if things have become a bit easier to integrate since last year, I know there's some ongoing work with a new playground for reasonml.org, maybe some of the efforts could be reused here.
Since BuckleScript officially ships with
Belt
as an alternative standard library (and officially recommends its use),Belt
should be available in ReBench.I am not sure how to go about integrating it at this time, but it would be a very welcomed improvement!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: