You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 3, 2020. It is now read-only.
Validation of proofs and contracts generally involves getting transactions based on a UTXO that they spent. This is a very costly operation since this detail is not indexed in the Bitcoin core. Adding the txid into proofs helps validation (the validator downloads that tx and checks that it really spends the UTXO)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@afilini am I right that this is the reason why you added bind_to field into the proof code, which was absent in the original spec? I am talking about this situation: rgb-archive/rust-rgb-2019#8
Validation of proofs and contracts generally involves getting transactions based on a UTXO that they spent. This is a very costly operation since this detail is not indexed in the Bitcoin core. Adding the
txid
into proofs helps validation (the validator downloads that tx and checks that it really spends the UTXO)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: