Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

resolution vs. "curvy-ness" #95

Open
calischs opened this issue Apr 28, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

resolution vs. "curvy-ness" #95

calischs opened this issue Apr 28, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@calischs
Copy link

Hi there,
Apologies if this is answered elsewhere, but I couldn't find it. I'm working on a sankey diagram with ~1000 nodes and I'm running into a limit on the granularity with which the strand widths are computed. For instance, the image below shows some nodes where the granularity causes the black bars and flow widths to be mismatched:
image

A workaround to fix this is to pass in a larger height and width to the to_widget() function. This fixes the mismatch between the bars and flows (as shown below), but it doesn't scale the radii of the flows. This means the diagram now looks much less smooth, as the flows now consist almost entirely of straight lines.
image

Any ideas or workarounds? Is there a way to set the "curvy-ness" of a sankey produced via floweaver?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant