Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Correct blame/praise #93

Open
Neves-P opened this issue Mar 18, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Correct blame/praise #93

Neves-P opened this issue Mar 18, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
@Neves-P

Comments

@Neves-P
Copy link
Collaborator

Neves-P commented Mar 18, 2020

Once more quoting richelbilderbeek #90 (not tagging anymore not to spam him):

Taking a look at the blame/praise
I see that Pedro and Josh worked on this. I suggest to add these to the list of
names.
@richelbilderbeek
Copy link
Collaborator

No worries, DAISIE mails are fun mails 🌈

Keep up the good job 👍

@Neves-P Neves-P self-assigned this Mar 18, 2020
Neves-P added a commit that referenced this issue May 16, 2020
@Neves-P
Simpler, faste, runnable examples in sim_constant_rate. Correct blame…
5c23922 
…. Progress #94 #93
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Neves-P Neves-P

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@richelbilderbeek @Neves-P