-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Issue with LDAPS Port 636 #188
Comments
We have never tested ldaps, I guess ldaps is oboslete after searching internet. |
Thank you for your fast response! Microsoft is still using ldaps on articles about configuring ldap: StartTLS is very popular because it works very easy to use because its backward compatible with plain text autentication and still use the old port. But i need to be sure that everything is always encrypted. As you can read in the comments on your link, not everyone agrees on this either: My LDAP Settings
|
Maybe related #99 (comment) |
Interesting. This could be the reason why if only TLS_1.3 is allowed. The LDAP(S) server is using TLS_1.2 (currently testet) because only the very latest Windows Server 2022 is supporting TLS_1.3. All other Windows Server Systems do not support TLS_1.3 |
Update: If that's the problem StartTLS also does not work because its also using TLS_1.2 on systems older then Windows Server 2022 (not personally testet but technically this make sense to me) |
Hello!
it seems that Version 1.1.14 does not allow LDAPS (fully encrypted using Port 636) but LDAP over TLS using STARTTLS (Port 389)
My Active Directory LDAP does not allow STARTTLS because it works by establishing a normal - i.e. unsecured - connection with the LDAP server before a handshake negotiation between the server and client is carried out.
I tried to connect to my LDAP Server using:
LDAP Host: ldaps://ldapserver.local, LADP Port: 636
LDAP Host ldapserver.local, LDAP Port: 636
But i always getting this error: Failed to update Ldap: failed to connect to ldap server
Isnt LDAPS implemented yet? Can someone check or confirm this?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: