We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Currently http://frontier.cern.ch/dist/rpms/RPMS/x86_64/ is used. However I think we should instead be using http://frontier.cern.ch/dist/el9/RPMS/x86_64/ (confirmed by a squid dev, the former is for legacy compatibility only).
This repo change should be done as part of the upgrade to squid v5. After that the changes related to version strings in #1 should work.
For the time being, an easy workaround is this slight change to the build command:
# this works docker build --build-arg SQUID_VERSION=4.17-2.1 -t gitlab-registry.cern.ch/sciencebox/docker-images/frontier-squid:4.17-2.1.el9 . # instead of this docker build --build-arg SQUID_VERSION=4.17-2.1.el9 -t gitlab-registry.cern.ch/sciencebox/docker-images/frontier-squid:4.17-2.1.el9 .
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Related to sciencebox/charts#124
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Currently http://frontier.cern.ch/dist/rpms/RPMS/x86_64/ is used.
However I think we should instead be using http://frontier.cern.ch/dist/el9/RPMS/x86_64/ (confirmed by a squid dev, the former is for legacy compatibility only).
This repo change should be done as part of the upgrade to squid v5.
After that the changes related to version strings in #1 should work.
For the time being, an easy workaround is this slight change to the build command:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: