feat(CSAF2.1): #364 add recommended test 6.2.44

Author: rainer-exxcellent

README.md

@@ -364,7 +364,6 @@ The following tests are not yet implemented and therefore missing:
 - Recommended Test 6.2.41
 - Recommended Test 6.2.42
 - Recommended Test 6.2.43
-- Recommended Test 6.2.44
 - Recommended Test 6.2.45
 - Recommended Test 6.2.46
 
@@ -462,6 +461,7 @@ export const recommendedTest_6_2_16: DocumentTest
 export const recommendedTest_6_2_17: DocumentTest
 export const recommendedTest_6_2_18: DocumentTest
 export const recommendedTest_6_2_22: DocumentTest
+export const recommendedTest_6_2_44: DocumentTest
 ```
 
 [(back to top)](#bsi-csaf-validator-lib)

csaf_2_1/recommendedTests.js

@@ -31,3 +31,4 @@ export { recommendedTest_6_2_27 } from './recommendedTests/recommendedTest_6_2_2
 export { recommendedTest_6_2_28 } from './recommendedTests/recommendedTest_6_2_28.js'
 export { recommendedTest_6_2_29 } from './recommendedTests/recommendedTest_6_2_29.js'
 export { recommendedTest_6_2_38 } from './recommendedTests/recommendedTest_6_2_38.js'
+export { recommendedTest_6_2_44 } from './recommendedTests/recommendedTest_6_2_44.js'

csaf_2_1/recommendedTests/recommendedTest_6_2_44.js

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+import Ajv from 'ajv/dist/jtd.js'
+import { parse, validate } from 'license-expressions'
+import license_information from '../../lib/license/license_information.js'
+
+const ajv = new Ajv()
+
+/*
+  This is the jtd schema that needs to match the input document so that the
+  test is activated. If this schema doesn't match, it normally means that the input
+  document does not validate against the csaf JSON schema or optional fields that
+  the test checks are not present.
+ */
+const inputSchema = /** @type {const} */ ({
+  additionalProperties: true,
+  properties: {
+    document: {
+      additionalProperties: true,
+      properties: {
+        license_expression: {
+          type: 'string',
+        },
+      },
+    },
+  },
+})
+
+const ABOUT_CODE_LICENSE_REF_PREFIX = 'LicenseRef-scancode-'
+
+const DEPRECATED_ABOUT_CODE_LICENSE_KEYS = new Set(
+  license_information.licenses
+    .filter((license) => license.deprecated && license.source === 'aboutCode')
+    .map((license) => license.license_key)
+)
+
+const DEPRECATED_SPDX_LICENSE_KEYS = new Set(
+  license_information.licenses
+    .filter((license) => license.deprecated && license.source === 'spdx')
+    .map((license) => license.license_key)
+)
+
+const validateSchema = ajv.compile(inputSchema)
+
+/**
+ * Check whether the license identifiers ref is a deprecated Aboutcode's license
+ * @param {string} licenseRefToCheck
+ * @return {boolean}
+ */
+function isDeprecatedLicenseRef(licenseRefToCheck) {
+  if (!licenseRefToCheck.startsWith(ABOUT_CODE_LICENSE_REF_PREFIX)) {
+    return false
+  } else {
+    const licenseKey = licenseRefToCheck.substring(
+      ABOUT_CODE_LICENSE_REF_PREFIX.length
+    )
+    return DEPRECATED_ABOUT_CODE_LICENSE_KEYS.has(licenseKey)
+  }
+}
+
+/**
+ * Recursively checks if a parsed license expression contains deprecated licenses
+ *
+ * @param {import('license-expressions').ParsedSpdxExpression} parsedExpression - The parsed license expression
+ * @returns {Array<string>} all deprecated licenses
+ */
+function allDeprecatedLicenses(parsedExpression) {
+  /** @type {Array<string>} */
+  const deprecatedLicenses = []
+  // If it's a LicenseRef type directly
+  if (
+    'licenseRef' in parsedExpression &&
+    isDeprecatedLicenseRef(parsedExpression.licenseRef)
+  ) {
+    deprecatedLicenses.push(parsedExpression.licenseRef)
+  }
+
+  if (
+    'license' in parsedExpression &&
+    DEPRECATED_SPDX_LICENSE_KEYS.has(parsedExpression.license)
+  ) {
+    deprecatedLicenses.push(parsedExpression.license)
+  }
+
+  if (
+    'exception' in parsedExpression &&
+    parsedExpression.exception &&
+    DEPRECATED_SPDX_LICENSE_KEYS.has(parsedExpression.exception)
+  ) {
+    deprecatedLicenses.push(parsedExpression.exception)
+  }
+
+  // If it's a conjunction, check both sides
+  if ('conjunction' in parsedExpression) {
+    deprecatedLicenses.push(...allDeprecatedLicenses(parsedExpression.left))
+    deprecatedLicenses.push(...allDeprecatedLicenses(parsedExpression.right))
+  }
+
+  // If it's a LicenseInfo type, it doesn't contain not listed licenses
+  return deprecatedLicenses
+}
+
+/**
+ * Checks if a license expression string contains deprecated licenses
+ *
+ * @param {string} licenseToCheck - The license expression to check
+ * @returns {Array<string>} all deprecated licenses
+ */
+export function allDeprecatedInLicenseString(licenseToCheck) {
+  const parseResult = parse(licenseToCheck)
+  return allDeprecatedLicenses(parseResult)
+}
+
+/**
+ * It MUST be tested that all license identifier and exceptions used are not deprecated.
+ * This SHALL be tested for the SPDX license list and Aboutcode's "ScanCode LicenseDB".
+ * The test MAY be skipped for other license inventorying entities.
+ *
+ * @param {unknown} doc
+ */
+export function recommendedTest_6_2_44(doc) {
+  /*
+        The `ctx` variable holds the state that is accumulated during the test run and is
+        finally returned by the function.
+       */
+  const ctx = {
+    warnings:
+      /** @type {Array<{ instancePath: string; message: string }>} */ ([]),
+  }
+
+  if (!validateSchema(doc)) {
+    return ctx
+  }
+
+  const licenseToCheck = doc.document.license_expression
+
+  if (validate(licenseToCheck).valid) {
+    const deprecatedLicenseIdentifier =
+      allDeprecatedInLicenseString(licenseToCheck)
+
+    deprecatedLicenseIdentifier.forEach((licenseKey) => {
+      ctx.warnings.push({
+        instancePath: '/document/license_expression',
+        message: `License identifier ${licenseKey}  is deprecated `,
+      })
+    })
+  }
+
+  return ctx
+}