-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Commitment and Obligation definitions depend on each other #1164
Comments
This definitely needs cleaned up. Can you provide explicit proposals for both commitment and obligation so it's easy to evaluate? |
Here's my suggestion: Commitment - a promise or firm decision, by at least one party, to do something. I like that these mirror our OWL definitions |
These are good. Perhaps add something about the promise may be contingent on something else - maybe in a scope note to keep the definition short and sweet. |
Perhaps a scope note saying 'In some cases, the promise or decision may become firm pending the occurrence of a contingent event' |
Or slight rewording:
|
Combine with #1166. |
Commitment is defined as "an obligation (possibly unilateral)." Obligation is defined as "A future commitment from one organization or person to another." Essentially, a commitment is an obligation with one or more participants, and an obligation is a commitment with two participants. The commitment definition could be improved by replacing the reference to the lower class.
Ideas for other phrases to use:
obligationthat restricts freedom of action (Oxford languages)agreementor pledge to do something in the future (Merriam-Webster)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: