You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I want to suggest an enhancement for the mlmnet function. Currently, the function requires vector inputs for parameters lambdas and alphas, even when only a single value is used. This can lead to unnecessary errors and additional coding overhead.
Current Behavior
When I pass a scalar value to the mlmnet function, it throws an error. For example:
It would be more user-friendly if the function could accept scalars when only one value is needed.
This change would simplify the function's usage when only one value is being used for these parameters.
Benefits
Reduces coding overhead.
Prevents common errors related to parameter types.
Enhances usability for simpler use cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
I want to suggest an enhancement for the
mlmnet
function. Currently, the function requires vector inputs for parameterslambdas
andalphas
, even when only a single value is used. This can lead to unnecessary errors and additional coding overhead.Current Behavior
When I pass a scalar value to the
mlmnet
function, it throws an error. For example:This results in an error due to the scalar inputs for
lambdas
andalphas
. Currently, the correct syntax would be for example:Suggested Behavior
It would be more user-friendly if the function could accept scalars when only one value is needed.
This change would simplify the function's usage when only one value is being used for these parameters.
Benefits
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: