Where should we keep the example apps? #36
-
Several repos (splunk-otel-java, splunk-otel-python) keep the example applications in the tracing-examples repo. Should we standardize that? Personally, I think that examples in the tracing-examples are very easily forgotten and can get out-of-date very easily, if we keep them in the main library repo it's easy to include the in the build process and keep them up-to-date. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 6 comments 4 replies
-
+1 for keeping them in the main repository. We can link from "tracing-examples" repo to these for sales/support engineers. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
+1 for keeping examples in the main repository. This however will mean some (heavy) repos changes - in ideal world main structure should be:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Shouldn't https://github.com/signalfx/microservices-demo be referenced in https://github.com/signalfx/tracing-examples |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Another one that should join the pack of tracing examples: https://github.com/flands/spring-petclinic-microservices/tree/flands/opentelemetry |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There are probably more - keeping those (eg related to splunk otel agent) in one place would GREATLY improve the situation. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I believe one of the big benefits of the tracing-examples repository is that you can provide examples across languages. Is there any reason why each project cannot link to the central tracing-examples repository? I would like to propose we keep the same model. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
+1 for keeping them in the main repository. We can link from "tracing-examples" repo to these for sales/support engineers.