Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace TYGS, or introduce it earlier? #6

Open
widdowquinn opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Replace TYGS, or introduce it earlier? #6

widdowquinn opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Milestone

Comments

@widdowquinn
Copy link
Collaborator

TYGS is the go-to classification server, but its turnaround time - especially under load - is a bit slow for the workshop.

The current placement in the workshop is late on because we build concepts/increase precision from 16S through MLST to whole-genome analysis. @mafeeney suggested presenting the TYGS section earlier, which I didn't want to do for the introduction of concepts but - if we implement #1 then we can keep TYGS at the end of the introductory section, and encourage students to do the TYGS analysis for the Brucella/Ochrobactrum case early on in that analysis - giving them chance of getting the TYGS result back quicker.

An option would be to replace TYGS, but I think the link to LPSN/DSMZ is important, as is seeing the real tool in action.

@widdowquinn widdowquinn added this to the 2024-25 milestone Jan 25, 2024
@widdowquinn widdowquinn added enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested labels Jan 25, 2024
@mafeeney
Copy link
Collaborator

To clarify, I did not mean to present the TGYS section earlier - I meant something along the lines of adding a first step, do XYZ because the jobs will take a long time to run - then by the time the students have worked through the rest of the material, the job should hopefully have run and they can look at/interpret their results then, in the same sequence as this year. The order of events works very well as is, I would not change that.

@widdowquinn
Copy link
Collaborator Author

widdowquinn commented Jan 26, 2024

I see - I was concerned about asking them to run TYGS on the genome sequence without a proper explanation before doing the 16S classification.

On one level it's a bit like "put the water on to boil now, I'll tell you why, later, and you'll thank me" but, in another sense we're actually doing the analysis by submitting the sequence rather than just preparing for a later analysis.

The practicality might outweigh my preference for a strict order of concepts, though ;)

@mafeeney
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, I agree that ideally the concepts should be presented in the current order.

However, the "boiling water now" analogy is apt and fits in well with what we tell them in the prac labs (time management skills, starting experiments that require long incubation times first...)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants