Replies: 1 comment 6 replies
-
Sorry to resurrect an old thread here, but am I missing something? What is the "issue with using the video of the M³ Zoom participant"? If things are done that way, then the integration could remain a co-host, send itself to waiting room/main meeting as needed, etc., and there would be no need to spotlight the host, but rather "itself", since the AV feed would be coming from the M³ Zoom participant. I might be missing something though like I said. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
There is a Zoom integration in progress (see #1303 for details). There is an issue with using the video of the M3 Zoom participant. A decision needs to be made concerning how to implement this feature going forward. These are the option briefly explained (feel free to ask questions):
Option 1 is sure to have the same audio/video quality as before, but the power of the integration is diminished.
Option 2 utilizes (almost) the full power, but the audio/video quality remains untested and forced spotlight adds complexity to the setup.
Option 3 allows users to choose and switch between the two options. If it turns out the audio quality is bad for option 2, option 1 can be selected. But it adds complexity to the feature and might confuse users on how to use this integration.
To be able to test all options, the test version has now implemented option 3 (both).
7 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions