-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Given/due/feedback for Homeworks not appropriate for peer-grading #462
Comments
Can you elaborate a bit? What makes this impractical?
Given the data that we have, it may be possible to do this but we need some ideas on how to make the notion of "relative to lecture progress" more concrete. The instructor specifying a "given date" was the obvious first step.
Grading is already possible at any time. Submission, on the other hand, is not. We went with the process of a "due date" because it makes some things very convenient:
If we want open submissions, an alternate solution would be to introduce the notion of a "draft answer vs final answer". Once the student marks an answer as "final", only then will it become available to instructors/peers for grading. At this point, we wouldn't allow students to update their answers because instructors/peers may have already started grading the answer. |
The current process makes sense for grade-relevant problems with official grading submissions deadlines, such as the quizzes. But for practice problems (which includes the homeworks) and peer-grading, we need to rethink the process entirely. |
When I create a homework (as opposed to a quiz), the process determined by the three dates of given-due-feedback is not practical.
Secondly, for ungraded/peer-graded homeworks, the following makes sense:
Is that something I can already accomplish with the current system?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: