Support Python 3.10 union syntax in UDF #1303
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
`str | None` should be equivalent to `Optional[str]`.
|
CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅ |
|
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA |
|
out of curiosity, any reason why isn't this PR submitted? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Please answer these questions before submitting your pull requests. Thanks!
What GitHub issue is this PR addressing? Make sure that there is an accompanying issue to your PR.
Fixes SNOW-1230425: Support Python 3.10 typing union syntax in UDFs #1302
Fill out the following pre-review checklist:
Please describe how your code solves the related issue.
str | Noneshould be equivalent toOptional[str].Add additional type check for
types.UnionType.