Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

config source by label with profile #1715

Open
wind57 opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

config source by label with profile #1715

wind57 opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@wind57
Copy link
Contributor

wind57 commented Sep 10, 2024

I have a question on our current implementation that I am not sure about.

Suppose that we want to read sources by labels, when profiles are used too includeProfileSpecificSources=true. An example will make this far easier to grasp.

In default namespace we have such configmaps:

 - "a" with labels `{color = red, shape = triangle}`
- "a-dev" with labels `{color=blue}`

We say: "I want to get all configmaps with labels {color = red, shape = triangle}, but also include profile specific sources" (and let's suppose dev is an active profile).

What we will do currently, is :

  • first find configmaps that match labels : {color = red, shape = triangle}, as such we will match a.
  • then for all active profiles take all configmaps that "match" previous ones (no matter if they have the needed lables). So, if we found a in the previous step, now take a-dev ("a" + "active profile") and take this configmap also.

Notice that we do read a-dev, though its labels : {color=blue} do not match the ones we initially requested for {color = red, shape = triangle}.

This looks like a bug, and we should really be taking only those configmaps that match the labels, no matter if they are plain or profile based labels.

wdyt?

@ryanjbaxter
Copy link
Contributor

I agree with you, all the config maps returned should match the specified labels.

@wind57
Copy link
Contributor Author

wind57 commented Sep 10, 2024

this will go into 3.1.x?

@ryanjbaxter
Copy link
Contributor

yes

@wind57
Copy link
Contributor Author

wind57 commented Sep 19, 2024

after further discussion, we came to the conclusion that having includeProfileSpecificSources + labeled search is not correct. As such, this combination will be dropped in the next major and this is the solution going forward.

The discussion can be seen here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants